Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 536 total)
  • FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2331394

    The In-fisherman chart says 50 inch Musky approximately 39 lbs.

    In-fisherman is generous and assumes you caught a fatty. A 39 lb 50 inch musky has a 25 inch girth which is a tank.

    That thing is gonna be a giant. Small head. Growing fast.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2331318

    Congrats on the musky! Check length x girth charts for a weight estimate. Probably around 30 lbs. Vertical holds are bad for big fish. Just a heads up for next time.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2330506

    I’d suggest going once most of the leaves are down. Third week of season is kind of hit or miss for that. Depends on the fall weather.

    Definitely bring the dog. A good dog that stays close will increase birds in the bag. Typically a pheasant dog has no trouble transitioning to grouse.

    There should be some woodcock around then. Great eating little bird contrary to what some say. Darker meat and I suggest cooking them like a duck rather than how you would cook a grouse or pheasant.

    I sent a PM with some helpful info. Good luck!

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2330399

    Turkey testicle festival!!!

    Entertaining post b-man. Good work as always. The boys have a good guide.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2328993

    Some of you appear to have some serious FFSDS.

    There have been hooking mortality studies on Muskies out of deep water so I don’t see any new revelations coming out of this study. This appears to me that the MNDNR wants to ban FFS for Muskies and they feel they need a study to justify doing so. I am guessing they will find the results they are after.

    The Muskie fishing in MN had dropped off significantly prior to FFS due to the declined stocking numbers by the dnr. They weren’t putting sufficient numbers of fish in to support the big increase in the popularity of the sport. Many lakes actually saw dramatic drops in stocking numbers and the fishing tanked. That problem hasn’t changed but now everyone wants to blame it on livescope. It has divided the musky community and they have lost focus on what really matters- we need more fish. Once the dnr gets the study results they are looking for to ban FFS, don’t expect musky fishing to improve. It ain’t gonna result in Muskies that aren’t there. It is a shame this money didn’t go in to stocking. Such a waste.

    Hopefully this goes better for the MNDNR than the barotrauma study they did that Weibe made them look like fools over.

    FWIW I own a livescope and have for years and I have never used it for Muskies and don’t plan to.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2327081

    Jimmy they make small looper bobbers. They work just fine for panfish. Best weighted bobbers that I have found.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2327075

    Marine general weighted casting bobbers. Aka looper bobbers. Great shore fishing bobber.

    Medium (.5oz) Weighted Casting Bobber

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2326832

    I am currently under a severe thunderstorm warning and then a winter weather watch. It’s nasty out right now.

    Mid week is projected for 7 inches of snow. Please no.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2326793

    I have caught salmon in the morning on Lake Superior and ice fished inland lakes in the afternoon during the spring. If the wind wasn’t so nasty this might be on the agenda this weekend.

    I’ve also shot ducks over water in the morning and ice fished the afternoon in the fall.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2326557

    Thanks Michael. I was hoping for waterfowl camo and 28 inch barrel for a spare waterfowl gun to my sbe2. Not that camo matters to the birds but it does to me.

    That gun looks brand new!

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2326370

    Benelli quit making the M2 in LH.

    Not true. They are severely back ordered though. I’ve been checking with a Benelli dealer every couple months. I am also in the market for a M2 LH 20ga. The few I have seen on gun broker have sold for over cost new. Hopefully they ramp up production soon.

    Michael, what would you sell the 12 for and what camo color?

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2325887

    Those people are crazy just like many of us hunters and fisherman. I think they’re nuts and don’t get the allure but I also know I’m nuts when it comes to my hobbies and have been told so many times.

    I saw a boat out bobbing around this weekend in the east wind. I figured it was b-man at first but upon a closer look, I think the boat was smaller than his. It looked pretty miserable, yet a small part of me was jealous. I was working this weekend. If I wasn’t so damn busy at work there is a good chance I woulda said fugg it and sent it too.

    Are they and us idiots? Maybe, everything is perspective I guess.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2324048

    Bladepuller, that is very interesting about the Muskie eggs. I had no idea they were pulling eggs out of Muskies on Mille lacs. Seems odd for many reasons. I assume this was mn dnr? I could see them trap netting for fishery research but not for stripping eggs. I thought most egg take was from leech and broodstock lakes but I’ll admit that I don’t follow that as much as I used to several years ago when I was a serious Muskie nerd, so maybe things may have changed.

    Can you share the guides names that are having success on Muskies consistently? I don’t hire guides but I’d be interested to know for buddies that would like to hire them if they can find the Mille lacs giants on a consistent basis. I’m too busy in the fall. Are they all livescopers? Are we talking a few giants each fall or several fish a week type fishing?

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2324037

    Cats tonight once the moon comes up. Crappies in the morning if it isn’t raining. Pulling the boat out of storage Sunday. I’d like to get out next weekend up at the cabin for one more ice trip but might be tough if weather is conducive for the boat.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2324029

    I love any mille lacs post. Always a great source for a debate jester

    lol lol lol So true!

    I gave up on Mr 55. Pretty pointless attempting a discussion with someone who demonstrates such poor reading comprehension.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2323871

    I meant they shouldn’t put any money in to the lake other than musky stocking.

    They stock so few now it isn’t even much of a fishery other than late springs when they are still shallow and the livescope guys. Those fish would provide more opportunity for fisherman in other lakes.

    So I’d be okay if the dnr stopped putting any money in to the lake.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2323858

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>FinnyDinDin wrote:</div>
    Man you are a pro. The best musky fisherman would be jealous of anyone who can catch two 55’s a year. What is your secret technique? It appears you want to kill all of them so surely you’ll share.

    obviously it’s forward facing sonar.

    Ripjiggin doesn’t seem smart enough to be able to utilize that technology proper.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2323855

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>FinnyDinDin wrote:</div>
    The state should really quit putting any money in to the lake other than musky stocking.

    Well the state doesn’t really stock it, so the only funds going to ML are in studying the lake (creel, fisheries mgmt etc.) and the little bit of enforcement they do there.

    It’s pretty clear to me they are managing to maximize tribal take, and minimize any other races take.

    When did they stop stocking Muskies in Mille lacs?

    The creel, fishery management, etc is the waste I am talking about. What is the point? It doesn’t seem like that has any effect on what the tribes allow us to take.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2323854

    Usually a 2-3 a year. Anymore than that I would have to get another chest freezer.

    Man you are a pro. The best musky fisherman would be jealous of anyone who can catch two 55’s a year. What is your secret technique? It appears you want to kill all of them so surely you’ll share.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2323739

    Here’s what I wish was easier articulate and more widely distributed:
    The tribe’s contribution to this plan cannot be understated.
    Of course I’m biased, but I would go as far as to say that the tribes wrote this plan that is obviously beneficial to the state. The tribes proposed the specifics of this plan.

    The state was having so many regulation problems and the tribes have a vested interest in the Mille Lacs fishery running smoothly. We came up with a solution

    The state should really quit putting any money in to the lake other than musky stocking. The state has no control, it’s all up to the tribes and this post just reinforces that. It’d be interesting to know how many millions of our state tax dollars go in to this lake. And for what? The tribe controls it. What a waste of dnr funds this lake is.

    I could see a potential for the lake to have more liberal regs if the state was just honest with all of us and admitted they don’t really have much of a say and said the tribe is going to set the rules. Then it’s all on the tribes, which it is now anyways, but maybe they’d decide to be more generous when the blame is on them. And maybe, just maybe, more people would stop supporting the casino when they are upset with the regulations. I wouldn’t hold my breath on that one though.

    I’m not upset with the rules and don’t blame the health of the lake fish populations on the tribes or netting. I’ve made that clear in the past. Personally I don’t think the lake ever had a problem. Some of the best fishing I have had out there was during the ‘crash’. Lake was nice and quiet and we were a slayin. I’d just like to see some honesty with the situation.

    I got a kick out of them patting themselves on the back for the tight regs leading to the current situation. The forage is the reason the lake is what it is right now. Humans like to think we are in control of everything. Did we create the perch and tulibee boom that led to the great survival of yoy walleyes?

    When I saw the new perch regs all I could do was laugh. The never ending drama that is Mille lacs lake.

    People best stop posting pictures of tullibee piles on social media. Next up is a closed tulibee season or restricted limit…on a minnow! lol lol

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2322181

    Glenn please post up an ice and shoreline report once you’re up there. I’d like to get up to the cabin by Winnie next weekend or the following for another trip. Hoping I can take the truck out and leave the wheeler at home. Not fishing on winnie.

    I live south of there and we lost most snow but shorelines and ice is still fine.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2321166

    That’s hardcore! March in the boat is awesome when it’s nice out but it wasn’t nice out at all. I saw a lot of ice floating around out there today.

    Go out of two harbors? Mcquade still locked up I assume?

    I’m excited to get out but need the snow to melt to get in to the pole building to get the boat out of hibernation.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2319559

    We did pretty good on Saturday. Not huge numbers but we got some true jumbo piggies. First two spots were duds and found them on the third. My old man and his buddy both caught their biggest perch. Sunday we searched high and low, deep to shallow scoping and fishing and never did find the big ones. Must have checked at least a dozen spots. I hope to head back sometime in March.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2319438

    I always enjoy the pics of your boys.

    I don’t like how the fish taste out of Michigan so I don’t head over there anymore. I’ll be out on superior in mn/wi a ton in the spring as usual. I think there will be some toads caught this spring based on what we’ve been pulling through the ice this winter. I’d like to try isle royale in may and see if I can find some coasters casting. We will be heading to the sixth Great Lake in June as well. Pretty pumped to get back there.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2319170

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>FinnyDinDin wrote:</div>
    We are gonna need your zip code included with your post to decide if you are allowed to weigh in on the topic.

    I don’t need your approval for anything FinnyDinDin.

    Lighten up Francis. It was a joke.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2319158

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Steve Root wrote:</div>
    I thought CO were law enforcement officers. Why wouldn’t they operate under the same rules as local PD or state police? Why the need for more new bills?

    SR

    Dnr officers been above the law since the beginning of time.

    Not nearly as much as people think. It’s a false rumor that many outdoorsmen believe.

    I will always refuse a search from any officer including CO’s and tell them they need a warrant. It is our constitutional right.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1075
    #2319103

    CO’s need warrants for many searches. People think they have more authority than they do and CO’s like that. I abide by the law but I don’t have time for their illegal searches and I’m not scared to tell them that.

    So I support the first one.

    Opposed to the second.

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 536 total)