I already shared most of my thoughts in the last FFS thread, but I will chime in on this one too since I keep seeing the same two weak arguments pop up:
#1: “What about GPS/DI/SI/trolling motors etc., didnt they help catch more fish? Should we ban those too?”
Yes, obviously each of those technologies help put more fish in the boat and very few people would support banning them. This line of thinking actually supports taking a closer look at tech in fishing. Combining all these technologies continues to put more pressure on our lakes and at some point there will need to be limits. As we can see even in this thread, there will be significant opposition to “banning” any tech that is mainstream, so it will be important to get ahead of future advances.
#2: “Finding fish on FFS doesnt mean they will bite”
Again, yes, obviously. Finding fish more efficiently leads to higher catch rates. FFS is a very powerful tool allowing anglers to find fish faster than previous technologies (in certain situations). Anyone who has watched a tournament lately knows the majority of anglers are absolutely glued to their screens, so to pretend its not a big advantage over old tech is ridiculous/laughable at this point.
To be fair, I do think there are more credible arguments pro-FFS that state something along the lines of “the point is fishing is to catch fish, so catching more fish is a good thing.” I can get on board with this one, I want to catch more fish too. I think the core question/issue relates to hooking mortality rates (especially for Muskies) and can our lakes handle higher catch rates at current stocking levels?
With all that said, I would be in full support of a $25 Muskie and/or Walleye stamp that went directly towards stocking.