I just remember all the Joy they brought !!!

Attachments:

1. 

   joy.jpg
   

Condolences on your loss Randy… what a couple they must have been, to have raised you ! Its a journey we all must take someday… we can only hope to have someone as dedicated as you to care for us then.

To think Walz is not a clown… is foolish at this point.

I guess it’s the staff then that have created the animal. So is it ok for someone in coach to stow their stuff in 1st class… or is there rules for that ?

On a not so chipper flight back from the DR years ago… after many fine drinks and cigars the night before… we were on a plane with about a dozen people… literally we almost had our own bathroom. I was thankful the plane was so empty.. one and only time ever with that nonsense on a plane

Is Scott Jensen considered a clown ? He lost 52-44 % last go round.

A cousins son was on that flight.. he was one of the last 2 left hospitalized. Glad he survived.

Is that a new thing where you get assigned overhead bin space just like assigned seating? Did I miss the memo?

Yes, its called common sense. Now I know who.

Dan wrote:

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>KPE wrote:</div>
To each their own, but I cannot understand this for the life of me. I’d pay extra to be guaranteed last person to board on every flight. Hate sitting there waiting for everyone to shuffle in, I want to buckle up and take off asap.

I would agree with you in all caps x10 if I could. 10000%. My wife is the complete opposite, she wants to go right away, even if we sneak into a zone ahead of us. When I’ve asked her why her answer is always “just to get on the plane.” I hate it, you’re gonna be sitting on that damn aircraft for hours anyway.

Same for me.. the wife wants on ASAP.. so the overhead bin above our seats isn’t jammed with someone else’s shi7 already. I want to walk on and they close the door. Who are these dips that think they have a right to put there stuff in my bin ?

Be at the ready with the hotdogs… they burn REALLY FAST and HOT when dry !!!

These look like the ones in northern Manitoba… they are THICK there ! Could make million$$$$ and get in some good fishing too !!

I think they build them for the homeless.. it gets cold here.

Pretty good turnout Saturday for the Perch Party !

Attachments:

1. 

   PERCHY-PARTY-2025.jpg
   

in St Joe…

Attachments:

1. 

   joy-glass.jpg
   

Anybody going to the Perch & Pout Party tomorrow at Hunters Point ?

We can back it up… not only on ice.

Johnny has lots of keyboard time from mommy lately. I mean that’s all they have… without the USA military, Johnny would be typing in Russian today.

Maybe the Senate can stay home like the House…

I think maybe the days of one neighbor calling on another that they have too many fish in the freezer, may require a warrant. I would think it would already, but if a CO said, they seen them out fishing, catching and keeping a lot of fish, they could skirt the warrant ? Not sure, but I agree, it probably needs some refining.

Was waiting for my opening…

Attachments:

1. 

   STICKERS.jpg
   

Nice work man !!!

FinnyDinDin wrote:

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>big_g wrote:</div>
The lake was a natural walleye producing beast… for decades….

It always has been. Nets haven’t changed that a bit. It simple logic really. But I know you love to blame nets and that dead horse has been beat plenty so I’ll leave it at that.

Blame nets ? That’s one part of it… Do you not think going from netting 0 lbs to 80,000 lbs would have zero effect ? Read what I wrote, anglers and nets targeting the same fish for over 8 years… its gonna take a toll. It changes the make-up of species in the lake, allowing others to flourish while decimating the walleye… record hatches or not.

If you actively were regularly fishing Mille Lacs from the late 80’s to around 2000.. you could see the demise happening. In the late 80’s and early 90’s.. the lake was as it always was… a Walleye churning machine. The netting was just the beginning of the end. Between the DNR having anglers target a “slot” of fish, constantly changing it here and there, but always between 13″ & 20″… the exact same fish that the natives were targeting with their nets. The walleye were taken down to an extreme level… which allowed Smallmouth, Muskie & Northern to flourish. That then just made it more difficult for walleye to make it past fingerlings. It cannot ALL be blamed on netting and anglers… but that is where it started, by targeting a lot of the reproducing fish. Back in the mid 90’s, We actually had a DNR fisheries surveyor that would stay at our place in the spring when they would do survey netting… he reiterated what we suspected. Depleted the Walleye too fast.

(I know nature also affects a system, but not for 20+ years running)

I disagree about the lake “always being that way before the nets”… The lake was a natural walleye producing beast… for decades… females being milked every spring for their eggs to help other lakes. Once netting started, you see the decline in walleye… the emergence of Muskie, Northern and Smallmouth was positively affected by the lack of walleyes. Big picture it went downhill after the netting. Do I blame natives…? Not anymore than I do the anglers, they all are just doing what the GLIFWC and the DNR said they can. Mismanaged from the start. Now it is starting to come back some and I hope lessons were learned.

He is comparing what he does to what the guy did in the article he referenced !!! It’s not that difficult. I also open accounts using my SSN… but certainly not in other peoples names with their SSN’s !

Riverrat wrote:

Doges budget averages an increase of 114% every 30 days. Not including the initial jump from 750,000$ to 6 million dollars the first week. By 2028 the DOGE budget would be about 75 billion dollars at the current rate.

Really shows how much corruption to uncover huh…?

Huntindave wrote:

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>big_g wrote:</div>
Reef… so you open several accounts for other people with their SSN… I pegged you to be smarter than what you just posted !! The moon is cheese !

That’s not what he wrote. Your reading comprehension is lacking.

People that were dead for decades, were cashing checks decades ago… not sure about currently what pay options are available.

That’s what the article said… I have no comprehension problems and know snide arrogance when I see it.

Reef… so you open several accounts for other people with their SSN… I pegged you to be smarter than what you just posted !! The moon is cheese !

Reef.. taken from your article ?

The review noted that in one case a man opened bank accounts using several different Social Security numbers — two of which belonged to number-holders born in 1869 and 1893, respectively. That would make one of them 145 years old and the other 121. The Social Security Administration’s system indicated that both number-holders were alive.

You don’t think a guy opening 2 bank accounts for people long deceased is fraud ? And these were just 2 of Several… of course he was depositing the checks in these accounts…. why else ?

Jimmy Jones wrote:

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Pailofperch wrote:</div>
Lots of internal findings with the DOGE team showing accounts receiving SS payments past 110-300 years old.

I think DOGE should focus on Musk’s cash cow, aka the US government contracts.

Now, back on topic.

Are you talking about the ones Rachel Madcow said he got…. during Bidens regime ?!