Good talk going on here. I would like to say this if I may. Hunters -NOT ALL- expect select members of the DNR to manage the herd for big bucks, but cry when these members manage the state herd for survival. I say state because that is probably (just my opinion) how they see it. Would hunters rather see 900 or more deer shot now, or see many many more die from the disease and lose the state herd? I would guess there is some reason 900 was chosen. Must be a percentage thing. It sucks it is so close to home. I’m glad the deer aren’t going to waste though. Anymore thoughts?
March 11, 2011 at 12:33 pm
#946138