I like the idea of two weigh-ins, smaller limits, or shorter tourney boundaries. I hope that at least some problem-solving comes out of this. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3d80/a3d80c97536d09db4c5661b842c859b967af6992" alt=""
Speaking of assumptions, I’m curious why many people have this underlying anger with the DNR. Seriously, is there not a decent number of people who seem peeved by the DNR no matter what happens, as though their sole purpose is to suppress outdoorsmen?
Also, in response to the earlier posts about the penned fish (brought up by Cade, et. al.)…I also questioned the penning technique and took the tournament side last year when they did this. However, as James has clearly explained, blaming the penning is weak. Though James pretty much refuted this completely, I would also add that, as far as we know from the article, none of the control group (fish that were also penned) died. Therefore, though other factors are at work (like the inherent higher stress levels of the tourney fish), I believe we have at least basic evidence that penning is not skewing the study.
If it looks like dog crap and smells like dog crap, it’s probably dog crap. To me, it’s very clear that tournaments in hot weather are causing some problems. We should move on to figure out how to solve them, whether through changed rules, increased info on how to hold the fish, banning mid-summer tourneys, whatever. Dialogue is a starting point.