<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>munchy wrote:</div>
According to the DNR, as of Feb. 10, 2022, gray wolves are once again a federally protected threatened species, and under current federal guidelines, wolves may only be taken in defense of human life.My livestock and my dogs all identify as Human!!
<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>munchy wrote:</div>
According to the DNR, as of Feb. 10, 2022, gray wolves are once again a federally protected threatened species, and under current federal guidelines, wolves may only be taken in defense of human life.My livestock and my dogs all identify as Human!!
I find it funny how some here pick and choose what fish and game laws they follow.
I find it funny how some here pick and choose what fish and game laws they follow.
[/quote]
That’s called life buddy, we all pick and choose what laws we feel like following every day.
Jonny
Laws based on emotion are different than laws based on biology.
And since we’re talking I bet you’ve never chosen to break a law.
Ever go over the speed limit? If so, shame on you for picking and choosing what laws you follow…
Jonny
Laws based on emotion are different than laws based on biology.
And since we’re talking I bet you’ve never chosen to break a law.
Ever go over the speed limit? If so, shame on you for picking and choosing what laws you follow…
yea little Jonny’s posts lately seem to want to pick a fight/arguement…..whatever the subject is….from what i’ve seen!!!! 
The same guidebook notes that adult gray wolves are about twice as tall and can be three times the weight of adult coyotes, but the animals have similar shapes and coloring.
Still, the hunting and trapping regulations state, “Shooting a wolf because you think it is a coyote is illegal and punishable by Minnesota game and fish laws.”
The DNR estimated in 2021 that there were roughly 2,770 wolves in Minnesota.
Young of the year wolves are very easily mistaken for adult coyotes at longer distances… depending on when they were born and what time of the year it is. Especially by inexperienced hunters! There is NO mistaking an adult wolf, You can tell at first glance!
A now retired CO told me B4 they went back on the list that if they were near my livestock I had every right to shoot them and I had 48 hours to call him after I killed one! They are WAY too plentiful in Mn. We see them here on a regular basis. Not to mention their tracks in the snow and very few deer tracks. The fact that tree huggers can run to any liberal judge to further their agenda is bogus. We have way more wolves than say Montana and they get a season on them! How is that fair or better yet scientific?? They are not endangered whatsoever. There are tens of thousands in Canada and Alaska!
Even more good news, the world needs more like him but smarter. SSS
Wolves are so endangered… in Manitoba, when you buy a Bear license, you can take a wolf with it also… just have to take the wolf first. 
Jonny
Laws based on emotion are different than laws based on biology.
And since we’re talking I bet you’ve never chosen to break a law.
Ever go over the speed limit? If so, shame on you for picking and choosing what laws you follow…
Right. There’s no science substantiating Mille Lacs walleye limits, as many others here have stated. So following your methodology, you’d have no problem with me keeping 100 walleyes next time I go out. Got it.
The Endangered Species Act/List has nothing to do with Canada. It’s an American law.
Sure, Canada might have wolves, perhaps a significant amount given it’s vast geographic size. But it has zero relevance to our Acts here.
Cant you hunt yotes at night with thermal? That would be a tough time to tell wolf vs yote too.
The Endangered Species Act/List has nothing to do with Canada. It’s an American law.
Sure, Canada might have wolves, perhaps a significant amount given it’s vast geographic size. But it has zero relevance to our Acts here.
OK… explain Alaska then.
(maybe establish a pack in NYC)
Bottom line, don’t kill wolves with firearms if you cant keep your mouth shut. Otherwise only motor vehicles are legal weapons for them.
<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>B-man wrote:</div>
JonnyLaws based on emotion are different than laws based on biology.
And since we’re talking I bet you’ve never chosen to break a law.
Ever go over the speed limit? If so, shame on you for picking and choosing what laws you follow…
Right. There’s no science substantiating Mille Lacs walleye limits, as many others here have stated. So following your methodology, you’d have no problem with me keeping 100 walleyes next time I go out. Got it.
You do what you want and when you get popped it’s on you. We are not your daddy, mother nor boss. It’s a personal choice to follow a law or not.
<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>gim wrote:</div>
The Endangered Species Act/List has nothing to do with Canada. It’s an American law.Sure, Canada might have wolves, perhaps a significant amount given it’s vast geographic size. But it has zero relevance to our Acts here.
OK… explain Alaska then.
(maybe establish a pack in NYC)
heck why not the metro area!!!!!
Well, didnt the dnr just release wolves down there to
Combat cwd?
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
