Little Wissota makes list of impaired lakes

  • Jason Sullivan
    Chippewa Falls, WI
    Posts: 1383
    #1338104

    I missed this article a couple weeks ago by Joe Knight.

    Quote:


    Little Wissota makes list of impaired lakes

    By Joe Knight
    Leader-Telegram staff
    About one-third of the phosphorus being dumped into Little Lake Wissota through Paint Creek and Stillson Creek needs to eliminated, according to a draft plan just released from the Department of Natural Resources.

    Little Lake Wissota, which suffers from frequent algae blooms, is on an Impaired Waters list for lakes that don’t meet federal and state water quality standards.

    The list includes Half Moon Lake in Eau Claire, Lake Menomin and Lake Tainter in Dunn County, Mead Lake in Clark County, Otter Lake in Chippewa County and Lake Wissota’s Moon Bay.

    The federal Clean Water Act requires the state to identify these polluted waters, then develop a plan for improving them, explained Ken Schreiber, a DNR watershed expert.

    The plans are called Total Maximum Daily Load because they determine the level of pollutants a lake can tolerate daily and still meet water quality standards.

    “We recognize this is not going to make it pristine, but it will make it noticeably better than it is right now,” Schreiber said.

    Dropping the phosphorus by 30 percent would mean at least another month of clear water in the summer before the lake turned green, he said.

    Little money is available for cost-sharing with landowners on conservation practices, but the county would do what it could, said Chippewa County Conservationist Dan Masterpole.

    “We’ll be working towards that over the next few years, but there’s practical problems. The state’s broke and getting broker,” Masterpole said.

    The county also is facing difficult budget cuts, he said.

    In the past a state priority watershed program funded county staff to work with landowners in a targeted watershed, and it supplied cost-sharing for conservation practices that kept sediments and nutrients out of waterways. That program is gone and hasn’t been replaced, he said.

    Schreiber said the old priority watershed program did a good job of cleaning up streams but wasn’t always as good about cleaning the green in impoundments like Little Lake Wissota.

    The problem is that too much phosphorus if being put on fields in the Paint Creek and Stillson Creek watersheds, he said. The nutrients end up in the creeks rather than fertilizing the fields, and they cause Little Lake Wissota to turn greener faster, he said.

    “A lot of these soils already have elevated phosphorus levels, but they’re still adding to it,” Schreiber said.

    A more scientific application of phosphorus fertilizer, based on soil testing, would help, he said.

    “Nutrient management is not very sexy. It generally does not get much play, but there’s way too much phosphorus being dumped on these fields,” Schreiber said.

    Masterpole estimated that around one-fifth of the agricultural land in the watershed is in a nutrient management plan.

    Although funding for land conservation is scarce, the federal farm bill still has some money for vegetative buffers along streams that filter nutrients and are good for wildlife, he said.

    “Probably the most cost-effective thing we can do is work with landowners to restore wetlands in the watershed and install buffers and work on nutrient management programs, he said.

    “We’re going to be entering a time here where people may be asked to do more on their own and not have a lot of well-funded initiatives,” Masterpole said.


    docfrigo
    Wisconsin
    Posts: 1564
    #749451

    Thanks for posting this very important issue.
    When will the state just mandate phosphorus free fertilizers on ground that is already rich in the stuff????
    That would be so easy, cost effective and reach a massive portion of the watersheds. Buffer zones would be great, but there is absolutely no money anywhere for that to be done.

    They have gotten to the point in Memonin that they started using barley bales, but afraid that is putting a band-aid on a severed limb.

    Jeremy

    Jason Sullivan
    Chippewa Falls, WI
    Posts: 1383
    #749840

    It looks like the clean up plan is open for public review.

    Quote:


    SUBJECT: Little Lake Wissota clean up plan is up for public review
    Chippewa County lake beset by algal blooms, high phosphorous levels
    MADISON – A clean-up plan for Little Lake Wissota in Chippewa County is available for a 30-
    day public review. The plan sets a level for how much pollution the lake can receive from all sources –
    known as a total maximum daily load, or TMDL – and still support appropriate aquatic life and
    recreational uses.
    Currently, Little Lake Wissota does not meet state or federal water quality standards. The lake
    exhibits excessive levels of phosphorus during summer months and is subject to algal blooms. Bodycontact
    recreation during the summer is impaired by poor water quality.
    Studies show most phosphorus flowing into the lake comes from runoff throughout the 43,194-
    acre watershed, which is defined by Stillson and Paint creeks. Most comes from agricultural sources.
    Phosphorus is also released from lake sediments under certain conditions.
    The state Department of Natural Resources, in conjunction with the Chippewa County Land
    Conservation Department and a local citizen advisory committee, has developed a TMDL plan for Little
    Lake Wissota. The TMDL calls for a 34 percent reduction in phosphorus discharges from the watershed
    and a 26 percent reduction in sediment discharges. Once the TMDL is approved, an implementation plan
    will be developed.
    The 30-day public comment period runs through March 2. The draft TMDL report can be
    reviewed on the DNR Web site http://dnr.wi.gov/org/water/wm/wqs/303d/TMDL.html.
    Questions or comments can be directed to Ken Schreiber, WDNR, 1300 W. Clairemont Ave.,
    Eau Claire, WI 54702, by phone at 715-839-3798 or e-mail at [email protected].


    whittsend
    Posts: 2389
    #770620

    Phosphate free fertilizers is one step, but re-creating wetland buffers (the destruction of which is often the largest contributer to pollution issues) should be top priority… We’ll never have clean water without wetland filters…. I don’t have answers on how to fix it, but we could start with never draining another wetland, and creating more where possible… Better filters, more waterfowl and fish habitat, etc…

    Some laws are in place that allow destruction of wetlands provided you create an equal sized wetland elsewhere. This “no net loss” of wetlands is extremely silly. What good would it do destroy an extisting wetland that filters a river, stream, lake, etc, and replace it with a wetland out in the middle of nowhere that filters nothing but rainwater.

    Silly.

    darrin_bauer
    Inactive
    Menomonie Wi.
    Posts: 260
    #770746

    Excellent information here. Whether it be agricultural runoff, failing septic sytems, or landowners improperly fertilizing their lawns in the watershed area, too little information is disseminated to the offenders and too little enforcement is available.
    Having Tainter and Menomin “unfishable” 3 months out of the year has been the norm for decades. While you can fish these waters, the experience is degraded due to the water clarity and sometimes the smell. Yet here we are in 2009 and the DNR focuses it’s resources on baiting and feeding deer instead of something important like water cleanup.

    I live between Boyceville and Menomonie and have 2 neighbors whose septic systems frequently overflow and run into the ditch and ultimately a creek feeding Wilson creek. A nearby farmer still pastures his cows in this same stream and farms crops and fertilizes fields within 20 feet of this creek. Where are the regulations and enforcement for this?

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.