It’s bad enough being the wildcard team against the #1. It’d be really bad missing just Parise. Missing 3 top forwards–I mean really–what can you expect? Honestly, 4-0 against a team with the amount of talent the Stars have?
There’s just nothing left in the tank. Best case scenario is to try to steal a game 2-1 or something like that.
The big picture view is like Pug says. The bitter irony of the NHL’s draft structure now is that to get a top 5 pick, you really, really, really have to suck. And the teams that suck for multiple years, stack the advantages because if you can pull an Edmonton or a Chicago and suck for multiple years when the draft is loaded…
The Parise/Suter deal doesn’t bug me and to be honest I think Suter especially gets a lot of criticism from people who don’t understand the game and haven’t even bothered to look at his stats. If you’re going to say get rid of Suter, then man up and say who you’re going to get to replace his numbers with. And I’m not talking a fictional trade/acquisition that will never happen, give me a deal that is actually doable with a RFA or FA or a trade that’s somewhere near reality based.
Bottom line is when you look at top players in the league, if you want ’em, you have to draft ’em. You’re not going to get in-their-prime guys like Ovetchkin on a trade deal.
Overall, I agree with Pug’s assessment. With the up/coming strength in the West, we’re looking at several years of “just missed it” unless we clean house and thus commit to a bottom third finish for 3-4 years as a rebuilding strategy. It would be painful to see, but looking at the drafts from the last 10 years, a case can be made for saying that in the current NHL, this is how it HAS to be done in the modern era.
Grouse