<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>TheFamousGrouse wrote:</div>
We’re not Florida or some other southern softy state where hockey is a bandwagon sport and something do to if you’re bored during the non-football season.
I resent resemble that remark. :p
I fixed that for you.
Boy this is going to be a long break.
You guys ever heard of Edmonton? High draft picks guarantees nothing. Yes it would be nice, but if you are unhappy with what has gone on the last three years, how happy would you be had we been bottom of the barrel the last 3 years?
You’re right, of course. Nobody loves being cellar dwellers, that’s for sure.
I think it’s a little soon to write conclusions on Edmonton’s recent draft picks. Especially with both McDavid and Nugent-Hopkins out with multi-week injuries.
If anything, Edmonton is proving that offensive firepower isn’t everything. Look at their goalies GAAs: 2.6 and 3.4. Yikes. Obviously, their well-publicized lack of solid play from the defense is part of this, but the GAAs tell the story.
But yes, draft picks aren’t everything. Not to cause us to relapse into our can’t-beat-the-Blackhawks complex, but if you read the way Chicago built their recent cup winning teams, yes they drafted and kept some great players with Kane and Towes. But they also made some trades and acquisitions for players like Hossa and in the process ended up giving up some players like Dustin Byfuglien.
The whole thing is a “never can tell” story, but to me looking at teams with that real franchise players, it seems to me like your best bet is to have have picks 1-3 in a draft if you’re strictly playing the odds. It’s not a sure thing, but it’s kind of like getting dealt an ace first in blackjack. It sure as hell doesn’t hurt.
Grouse