What's a big bluegill to you?

  • Ahren Wagner
    Northern ND-MN
    Posts: 410
    #1881991

    I’ve noticed a lot of people have different opinions about what a big bluegill is. For me I’d say 10″ inches. My biggest one is 11.5 inches, but I’ve heard people saying that in Minnesota 8 inches is huge, probably because most people are generally fishing more pressured, more popular waters than I do. What would you all say?

    James Holst
    Keymaster
    SE Minnesota
    Posts: 18926
    #1881993

    10″ + for me and I’m one happy guy!

    Beauty is in the eye of the gill-holder. grin

    sji
    Posts: 421
    #1881995

    10″ + for me and I’m one happy guy!

    Beauty is in the eye of the gill-holder. grin

    LOL. So true

    bigpike
    Posts: 6259
    #1882009

    Excuse me while I whip this out! 10″

    eyefishwalleye
    Central MN
    Posts: 182
    #1882014

    I’ve never ever bothered to measure one but my gauge to release them is when their forehead area looks like it is going to burst open!

    Steve Root
    South St. Paul, MN
    Posts: 5623
    #1882018

    The ones you can’t get your hand around, the ones with “shoulders”. I’ve had the privilege of catching a few of those monsters with a light fly rod. Huge fun!

    S.R.

    gimruis
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 17348
    #1882020

    North American In Fisherman Master Angler says a trophy bluegill in this region is 11 inches or 2.0 pounds. That’s probably a fair assessment, although its pretty rare to get one that’s even 8 or 9 inches nowadays.

    tegg
    Hudson, Wi/Aitkin Co
    Posts: 1450
    #1882022

    I tend to notice once they are 9″+ but would say 10″ is a good benchmark.

    tbro16
    Inactive
    St Paul
    Posts: 1170
    #1882059

    Beauty is in the eye of the gill-holder.

    Aint that the truth. I’d flip a 10″+ gill over the side of the boat like it were a bullhead hoping to pull a 13″ walleye up with the next cast

    Pailofperch
    Central Mn North of the smiley water tower
    Posts: 2918
    #1882063

    10″ is getting to be special. This one was just under 12″ and released. Sorry no tape pic…..

    Attachments:
    1. IMG_20190308_181416509.jpg

    Mike J
    Wright County
    Posts: 127
    #1882100

    Wow, what a beast

    Ahren Wagner
    Northern ND-MN
    Posts: 410
    #1882200

    Too bad people don’t release them more, they would be so much bigger. I’ll let anything over 8 go.

    Dan
    Southeast MN
    Posts: 3780
    #1882206

    New question: Has anyone ever made one of your aforementioned large bluegill look as big in a picture? I swear when I lay one on my hand for context the picture always makes it look smaller.

    Ahren Wagner
    Northern ND-MN
    Posts: 410
    #1882215

    New question: Has anyone ever made one of your aforementioned large <em class=”ido-tag-em”>bluegill look as big in a picture? I swear when I lay one on my hand for context the picture always makes it look smaller.[/quote

    They do that a lot, no clue why. It usually looks better when you just grab them by their belly, like the 11.5″ gill in my profile picture. Then you don’t have to worry about the hand.

    Calvin Svihel
    Moderator
    Northwest Metro, MN
    Posts: 3862
    #1882217

    10″ is my benchmark for a big gill!

    JEREMY
    BP
    Posts: 3894
    #1882224

    I never measure them but when the fillet fits perfectly in my little 9″ frying pan them are nice ones.

    JEREMY
    BP
    Posts: 3894
    #1882225

    Just kidding. Only ever caught a couple 10″ers and ive fished a lot so I would say I would consider 10″ big.

    Alagnak Pete
    Lakeville
    Posts: 348
    #1882227

    New question: Has anyone ever made one of your aforementioned large <em class=”ido-tag-em”>bluegill look as big in a picture? I swear when I lay one on my hand for context the picture always makes it look smaller.

    You can’t go wrong with a pic on a tape- ever. No camera tricks needed, no make up, no holding it out, etc. I’d rather see a fish on a tape than a bragging selfie any day of the year. Some people fish for fish and some people fish for attention.

    zooks
    Posts: 922
    #1882245

    I tend to notice once they are 9″+ but would say 10″ is a good benchmark.

    I’d agree with this and I’m lucky to have caught a bunch of 9″+ gills in my life, think my biggest is around 10.5″ though.

    BigWerm
    SW Metro
    Posts: 11624
    #1882274

    When they are big enough to hit, and stay hooked up, to a shad rap or husky jerk. jester

    Deuces
    Posts: 5236
    #1882364

    The ones you can’t get your hand around, the ones with “shoulders”.

    We would catch em on a certain lake that had hump heads. Literally muscle coming up would be bumped up just past their head.

    Those things would put a twist on your line coming up!

    JEREMY
    BP
    Posts: 3894
    #1882426

    I asked my dad what he thought. He said sunnies around here are all deformed cause “their heads to close to their tail.”

    walldows
    Posts: 101
    #1882434

    Any sunfish 10″ or bigger I put back. The smaller ones taste better to me anyway.

    tornadochaser
    Posts: 756
    #1882465

    I catch a few 10″ gills every summer. My buddy caught one just under 12″ this summer while we were trolling #5 hornets.

    zooks
    Posts: 922
    #1882479

    When they are big enough to hit, and stay hooked up, to a shad rap or husky jerk. jester

    Didn’t measure but this one went 8.5″-9″, got about 10-12 of these one morning this June mixed in with eyes and perch pulling #4’s and #5’s. NE SD and western MN have lots of big gills if you know where to look.

    Attachments:
    1. crankbait-gill.jpg

    Bass Thumb
    Royalton, MN
    Posts: 1200
    #1882483

    10″ is the benchmark for a really nice gill, but I get pretty excited just to find a pile of 8.5-9″ers thru the ice.

    Ahren Wagner
    Northern ND-MN
    Posts: 410
    #1882484

    I’ve found big bluegill pretty much everywhere that isn’t super pressured. The main problem is people keeping the big ones.

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 35 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.