WD 40 on Reels

  • Snake ii’s
    Posts: 517
    #1763358

    It’s a floor wax AND a dessert topping.

    Attachments:
    1. CWUOSnYXAAAQbG0.jpg

    Karry Kyllo
    Posts: 1271
    #1763377

    I’m looking at the current MSDS version on the WD-40 website, but it really makes no difference. I don’t think anyone wants to intentionally put petroleum products in our lakes and rivers. When have petroleum products ever been beneficial to aquatic life?
    My original point was that the main ingredient in WD-40 isn’t fish oil and I think that several of us have busted that myth.

    Ralph Wiggum
    Maple Grove, MN
    Posts: 11764
    #1763381

    @mericaneagle
    I appreciate the fact that you’re correctly referring to it as an SDS, not an MSDS. smirk

    ClownColor
    Inactive
    The Back 40
    Posts: 1955
    #1763382

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Jon Jordan wrote:</div>
    Fish Oil is NOT an ingredient in WD-40. This is another urban legend that has been around for a long time.

    Another IDO expert responds.
    Knows more than the people who created it.

    This site sometimes cracks me up.

    This should be in the “best of” section. Must be getting his news feed and facts from Facebook…Damn Russians hacked WD-40 now!

    Karry Kyllo
    Posts: 1271
    #1763413

    @mericaneagle
    I appreciate the fact that you’re correctly referring to it as an SDS, not an MSDS. smirk

    My age is showing. When I was a chemist, which is several years back, a SDS was known as a MSDS.

    Ralph Wiggum
    Maple Grove, MN
    Posts: 11764
    #1763424

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Ralph Wiggum wrote:</div>
    @mericaneagle
    I appreciate the fact that you’re correctly referring to it as an SDS, not an MSDS. smirk

    My age is showing. When I was a chemist, which is several years back, a SDS was known as a MSDS.

    It just changed a couple years ago. It only sticks out in my mind because I’ve heard of OSHA citations from using the incorrect term.

    glenn57
    cold spring mn
    Posts: 11840
    #1763435

    so MSDS stood for …….material saftey data sheet

    whats the SDS REFER too???????

    404 ERROR
    MN
    Posts: 3918
    #1763446

    It’s now just a Safety Data Sheet. More streamlined and much easier to read. Most are also about 75% the length of the old format.

    glenn57
    cold spring mn
    Posts: 11840
    #1763457

    It’s now just a Safety Data Sheet. More streamlined and much easier to read. Most are also about 75% the length of the old format.

    waytogo waytogo awe i see!!! thanks. back in the day when i worked on the shop floor i was on the saftey committee. then i had some lite duty so i got stusk putting that book together………….what a pain in the moon that was!!! doah

    Huntindave
    Shell Rock Iowa
    Posts: 3088
    #1763467

    Are we looking at the July 20, 2014 version? That is the most current and it has no mention of any of that under ecotoxicity…


    https://www.wd40company.com/files/pdf/sds/mup/wd-40-multi-use-product-aerosol-sds-us-ghs-7-20-14.pdf

    Possibly we are looking at two slightly different products, both made by WD40?
    The SDS with the “other language” is;

    1 – Identification

    Product Name: WD-40 Rust Release Specialist® Penetrant Spray

    Product Use: Cleaner, Lubricant

    Restrictions on Use: None identified

    SDS Date Of Preparation: 07/17/2014

    catnip
    south metro
    Posts: 629
    #1763487

    It also makes a great cologne.

    grizzly
    nebraska
    Posts: 971
    #1763527

    spray it on the bait for more bites, it works

    Matt Moen
    South Minneapolis
    Posts: 4307
    #1763534

    Well, not only am I going to spray more on now……I also have a bunch of useless information for Trivial Pursuit. That’s why I love this site.

    BTW, does anyone know what the 40 in WD40 stands for?

    Ron
    Victoria, mn
    Posts: 810
    #1763535

    I believe it was the 40th formula the lab tried. Not sure where I heard that.

    Matt Moen
    South Minneapolis
    Posts: 4307
    #1763541

    I believe it was the 40th formula the lab tried. Not sure where I heard that.

    Winner winner, chicken dinner.

    rvvrrat
    The Sand Prairie
    Posts: 1840
    #1763847

    · 51% Stoddard solvent (i.e., mineral spirits: primarily hexane, somewhat similar to kerosene)

    Wow. Hexane is a very effective organic solvent. Good to know.

    scassidy77
    Posts: 6
    #1763850

    Not trying to ruffle any feathers, but I am 40 years old, and have been using WD-40 for catfishing since I was a teenager. I can assure you with 100 percent certainty that is WORKS GREAT! There is no if ands or buts about it. If you say it doesn’t work or that it is just a myth, then you have never tried it.

    My cut baits and live baits sprayed with WD-40 consistently out fish other baits not laced with WD-40. I’ve tested it many times over the years with people who didn’t believe it, until they experienced it first hand.

    One of easy way to prove this is to buy 2 tubs of dip bait for catfishing. In one tub of dip bait spray WD-40 into it full stream for 5-6 seconds and then stir it up and then thicken the dip bait back up with flour. Leave the other tub of dip bait just as it is. Fish with the 2 side by side for a couple outings. See which one catches the most fish. Then you will see.

    I have never tried it for any other species personally, but do know people that have used it for bass fishing and claim that it works well.

    And yes it obviously leaves a tiny little bit of chemical in the water, but not even close to as much as a boat motor or jet ski does, and people don’t think twice about that.

    Dutchboy
    Central Mn.
    Posts: 16658
    #1763895

    Can’t believe I just read this whole thread. tongue shock

    Matt Moen
    South Minneapolis
    Posts: 4307
    #1763899

    Can’t believe I just read this whole thread. tongue shock

    Yes you can – it was informative and entertaining with just a hint of controversy. That’s like the perfect IDO thread.

    Dutchboy
    Central Mn.
    Posts: 16658
    #1763924

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Dutchboy wrote:</div>
    Can’t believe I just read this whole thread. tongue shock

    Yes you can – it was informative and entertaining with just a hint of controversy. That’s like the perfect IDO thread.

    Well there was a bit of that. grin

    Kyhl
    Savage
    Posts: 749
    #1763930

    Not trying to ruffle any feathers, but I am 40 years old, and have been using WD-40 for catfishing since I was a teenager. I can assure you with 100 percent certainty that is WORKS GREAT! There is no if ands or buts about it. If you say it doesn’t work or that it is just a myth, then you have never tried it.

    My cut baits and live baits sprayed with WD-40 consistently out fish other baits not laced with WD-40. I’ve tested it many times over the years with people who didn’t believe it, until they experienced it first hand.

    One of easy way to prove this is to buy 2 tubs of dip bait for catfishing. In one tub of dip bait spray WD-40 into it full stream for 5-6 seconds and then stir it up and then thicken the dip bait back up with flour. Leave the other tub of dip bait just as it is. Fish with the 2 side by side for a couple outings. See which one catches the most fish. Then you will see.

    I have never tried it for any other species personally, but do know people that have used it for bass fishing and claim that it works well.

    And yes it obviously leaves a tiny little bit of chemical in the water, but not even close to as much as a boat motor or jet ski does, and people don’t think twice about that.

    Have you tried adding water and flour to a batch instead of WD40? This would tell you if it is the WD40 or the flour.

    Gitchi Gummi
    Posts: 3045
    #1763969

    The reason WD40 has had success on fishing lures, according to Lake Superior charter captains, is because it is a cleaner. It does not attract fish, contrary to popular belief. The cleaning solution simply eliminates or minimizes the scent from you actually touching the bait/lure, the natural oils on your hands and any other smells that may rub off on the bait from your hands such as gas, oil, sunscreen, chew, dorito chip residue, etc.

    saugeye-steve
    Posts: 293
    #1763979

    The reason WD40 has had success on fishing lures is because it is a cleaner. It does not attract fish, contrary to popular belief. The cleaning solution simply eliminates or minimizes the scent from you actually touching the bait/lure, the natural oils on your hands and any other smells that may rub off on the bait from your hands such as gas, oil, sunscreen, chew, dorito chip residue, etc.

    oh boy

    404 ERROR
    MN
    Posts: 3918
    #1763983

    The reason WD40 has had success on fishing lures is because it is a cleaner. It does not attract fish, contrary to popular belief. The cleaning solution simply eliminates or minimizes the scent from you actually touching the bait/lure, the natural oils on your hands and any other smells that may rub off on the bait from your hands such as gas, oil, sunscreen, chew, dorito chip residue, etc.

    rotflol

    I spray myself down with a heavy dose of WD40 before climbing into my tree stand when I bow hunt too…Works like a charm…

    ClownColor
    Inactive
    The Back 40
    Posts: 1955
    #1764051

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Jake wrote:</div>
    The reason WD40 has had success on fishing lures is because it is a cleaner. It does not attract fish, contrary to popular belief. The cleaning solution simply eliminates or minimizes the scent from you actually touching the bait/lure, the natural oils on your hands and any other smells that may rub off on the bait from your hands such as gas, oil, sunscreen, chew, dorito chip residue, etc.

    rotflol

    I spray myself down with a heavy dose of WD40 before climbing into my tree stand when I bow hunt too…Works like a charm…

    We use it on our baby’s bum when changing diapers…with the pressure it’s two fold, works like a bidet!

    targaman
    Inactive
    Wilton, WI
    Posts: 2759
    #1764074

    When I was a kid I caught chubs in the creek on a plain hook sprayed with wd 40.

    pool2fool
    Inactive
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts: 1709
    #1764084

    This is my most favorite thread in a long time.

    targaman
    Inactive
    Wilton, WI
    Posts: 2759
    #1764093

    after the wd40 wore off they wouldn’t touch the bare hook then I’d coat it again and game on. You can’t tell me fish aren’t attracted to it.

    Matt Moen
    South Minneapolis
    Posts: 4307
    #1764115

    Well, I used the WD40 rod in question today and got skunked on it. I used non WD40 rods and did pretty well.

    I’m going with the assumption fish don’t like it…..the controversy continues I guess.

    Dutchboy
    Central Mn.
    Posts: 16658
    #1764116

    Matt, bring a roll of masking tape next time. Mask off 1/2 and spray the lure. See which 1/2 you hook up on.

Viewing 30 posts - 31 through 60 (of 73 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.