New rally cry” Back to 6 in 2006″

  • SLee
    Crystal,MN
    Posts: 168
    December 9, 2005 at 3:15 am #212691

    Back to six in 2006!!

    This is the new rally cry that we are trying to get the MNDNR to listen to.

    Its kinda catchy too!

    mossboss
    La Crescent, MN
    Posts: 2792
    December 9, 2005 at 3:00 pm #13091

    Never really got the MNDNR’s reasoning behind that one.

    Didn’t you guys still have a 4 mallard limit? Was this 4 duck limit then an effort to save the widgeon, gadwall, redhead, teal, etc.?

    If it would have went to 4 birds, 3 mallards or something, I think it would have looked more like trying to save MN’s resident mallard population. I didn’t get it, still don’t.

    mossboss
    La Crescent, MN
    Posts: 2792
    December 9, 2005 at 3:00 pm #402564

    Never really got the MNDNR’s reasoning behind that one.

    Didn’t you guys still have a 4 mallard limit? Was this 4 duck limit then an effort to save the widgeon, gadwall, redhead, teal, etc.?

    If it would have went to 4 birds, 3 mallards or something, I think it would have looked more like trying to save MN’s resident mallard population. I didn’t get it, still don’t.

    kris_brantner
    My river
    Posts: 1678
    December 11, 2005 at 6:25 pm #13129

    im glad they changed the 2 hen limit to one but i also dont get the reasoning for them changing the limits to 4

    kris_brantner
    My river
    Posts: 1678
    December 11, 2005 at 6:25 pm #402986

    im glad they changed the 2 hen limit to one but i also dont get the reasoning for them changing the limits to 4

    SLee
    Crystal,MN
    Posts: 168
    December 12, 2005 at 3:25 am #13156

    There was NO biological/scientific reason at all. The MNDNR had some meetings before the season started and said that lowering the limit will have minimal ,if any effect. They said that reducing the days would impact the harvest…but then they go ahead and reduce the bag limit?

    It makes no sense. I think they were trying to appease all the so called hunters who just go hunting to see the sunrise….you know the kind of guys who won’t go when its cloudy…or raining…or to cold….or to hot…or to far away!

    Apparenty…these guys have been crying a river to the DNR to lower the limits in hopes that they can go anywhere and kill a limit. Plus….they don’t really want to be out there much longer than to see the sunrise so a lower limit might allow them to go home earlier….or at least say they were only 2 or 3 ducks short of a limit!

    SLee
    Crystal,MN
    Posts: 168
    December 12, 2005 at 3:25 am #403075

    There was NO biological/scientific reason at all. The MNDNR had some meetings before the season started and said that lowering the limit will have minimal ,if any effect. They said that reducing the days would impact the harvest…but then they go ahead and reduce the bag limit?

    It makes no sense. I think they were trying to appease all the so called hunters who just go hunting to see the sunrise….you know the kind of guys who won’t go when its cloudy…or raining…or to cold….or to hot…or to far away!

    Apparenty…these guys have been crying a river to the DNR to lower the limits in hopes that they can go anywhere and kill a limit. Plus….they don’t really want to be out there much longer than to see the sunrise so a lower limit might allow them to go home earlier….or at least say they were only 2 or 3 ducks short of a limit!

    mudcatkid
    On water
    Posts: 663
    December 12, 2005 at 3:48 am #13158

    Quote:

    ….or at least say they were only 2 or 3 ducks short of a limit!

    HAHAHAHA…….ok, that made me laugh.

    mudcatkid
    On water
    Posts: 663
    December 12, 2005 at 3:48 am #403079

    Quote:

    ….or at least say they were only 2 or 3 ducks short of a limit!

    HAHAHAHA…….ok, that made me laugh.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.