Fish..,
Go to the Remington website, and view the video clip they have in which they hang a metal plate, and then commence to shoot it first with steel-shot, in which it only dents it, then, from the same spot, they shoot it with the same sized shot in Hevi-shot. Just about rips that plate off it’s hanger, and completely blows through it.
Now, having said that, I have shot the stuff on turkeys. Then used those left-overs on ducks. Yup…, it smacks ’em DOA.
However, I refuse to pay that money for those shells. My reasoning??? If I cannot kill a duck or goose with a quality, high-velocity steel load, then in my opinion, that duck/goose is a looooong ways off, and doesn’t deserve to be poked at. A pellet in the guts from steel, tungsten, bismuth, hevi…, whatever…, is a pellet in the guts.., and a dead bird that sails off never to be recovered. Remember, you need pattern density to kill a bird. I am quite sure that a #4 Hevi-shot pellet hitting a bird in the right spot, would probably fold a mallard at 60-yards or more. But can anyone state that they can put that pellet in a vital area, at that range??? I don’t think so. You only have so many pellets in a shell.., and a weak pattern is a weak pattern, irregardless of what we shoot at ’em.
A duck or goose in range can only be killed so dead. Killing them “deader” than they need to be is a waste of money.
Just my thoughts. Way too spendy, and in the wrong hands, (not implying your hands), they are true promoters of sky-busting. And that was something that went way down when only steel was available, as people seen the futility in it. (No, it didn’t go away completely, but it did decrease). With the “new” loads available now, I personally see sky-busting returning.
If it gives you confidence, and you can afford it, by all means use it. If you can’t or don’t, you won’t miss out on any less enjoyment of the hunt.