Here’s the long story shortened. I have a fishing buddy (he doesn’t visit this site) who was heading to the river to fish. He called me asking for some info and I gave him one of my hotspots to try. That evening he sends me a pic of some eyes laying on his driveway, with several whoppers, including a 7, 6.5, and a 4. I talk to him a few days later and say, “Man, I can’t believe you kept those big ones!!!” I figured they wouldn’t taste good because they were so big. He says nope, they were some of the best fish he’s ever eaten. A bunch of people came over to his house for a fish fry and everyone loved them. I was like, “what?????” and he said the texture of the fillets was great, the flakes were big, and on and on. He said he really preferred them over the smaller fish. I will say this guy is GREAT at filleting fish and cooking them, a lot better than the average joe. It did get me to thinking about the subject of eating larger fish. I’m a bass fisherman, so I let go 98% of the fish I catch. I have kept two large walleyes to eat on separate occasions. One was a 6 3/4 lb. fish I meant to mount but didn’t. It sat in the freezer for 14 months whole, at which time I thawed it out, filleted it, and it was absolutely delicious. Not sure what happened there, but it was good. The other was a 7lb. class fish caught ice fishing last year. That fish was also very tasty. I guess the conclusion is that big walleyes are pretty tasty. I still practice catch and release, and throw back almost all my walleyes. I was just curious about anyone else’s experience in the matter.
IDO » Forums » Fishing Forums » Mississippi River » Mississippi River – Walleye » Eating Large Fish
Eating Large Fish
-
jakefroyumPosts: 94October 19, 2012 at 1:52 pm #1106260
We kept one that was about 8-9 lbs after it floated back up a half hour or so after catching it and it couldn’t be revived. It tasted great but so did all the 18″-20″ we ate at the same time. Cna’t say I noticed a difference. The fillets were so thick we filleted them in half so they cook better.
October 19, 2012 at 1:57 pm #1106262Cant imagine a larger river fish tasting good. event he smaller ones from the Mississippi river seem to have the hint of mud taste. Was he fishing the pig eyes discharge? Much cleaner water there.
October 19, 2012 at 2:03 pm #1106266I haven’t kept a large fish for many years.
Mike, do you remember what mercury, dioxin and PCB’s taste like?
Seriously, taste and contaminates aren’t my (personal) reason to release the big guys. It’s two fold in my book.
I want/hope someone else will have the goose bump excitement of catching a larger fish.
I hope to keep those big fish genes in the water for the same above stated reason.
However what each person does with the fish they catch is TOTALLY up to them. So…Fish On!
October 19, 2012 at 2:13 pm #1106268Quote:
Most people let the large fish go because they’re the spawners, not because they taste bad.
Also, you can’t taste the higher level of mercury in the larger fish, but it’s still likely there.
Just my take on it.
I agree Ryan…Pool 2 is a fisherman’s dream because those fish mature to their full potential and the gene pool is passed on by prime breeders.
Pool 4 became the fishery it is today by many sportsmen and IDOers releasing Prime breeder females over 6#.
No problem with anyone keeping legal limits of fish but I have always wondered why the DNR have never protected the breeding base by limiting the harvest on Big Spawners?
There are lots of smaller Sauger and Walleye to grace the table and, IMHO better tasting, less pollutants.October 19, 2012 at 2:19 pm #1106269If they put size restrictions on pool 3 and 4 do you think the tournaments would go away?
October 19, 2012 at 2:25 pm #1106270I’m not a fan of eating large fish, and naturally the spawners are the future.
Regardless, we all have had fish die on us no matter how well of a job to revive it. I think we have a moral obligation to utilize them if they die. I don’t keep them by intention, but if its dead, it gets used.
Now my Mother will beg for those huge eyes and pike. She bakes them and dips with butter and swears there is nothing better than that to eat…October 19, 2012 at 2:38 pm #1106275Randy. I think you could eat a shoe tongue dipped in melted butter and it would taste good.
October 19, 2012 at 2:45 pm #1106277Quote:
Most people let the large fish go because they’re the spawners, not because they taste bad.
Also, you can’t taste the higher level of mercury in the larger fish, but it’s still likely there.
Just my take on it.
x2
October 19, 2012 at 4:03 pm #1106294Tasting great and out of the river don’t normally go hand in hand in my opinion.
Maybe he seasoned them or used a strong batter. A few years ago I kept a couple 17-18 inchers….I think in the spring before the barges started running and I couldn’t eat them….my dad said they were great but he had enough tartar sauce on them to choke a horse so I have no idea how he could taste the fish.
After eating as many fish in my life as I have from lakes like Winni, Lake of the Woods, Mille Lacs, Leech, Canadian lakes I will admit I am horribly spoiled with the quality of walleyes I am eating so I just practice C&R if I am hesitant about taste or contaminents.
That’s just me….I know a TON of people eat them and say they are great and I am happy for them.
October 19, 2012 at 4:06 pm #1106295River Slot limit,
the DNR has always said on pool 4 that there are so many fish in the pool, and that they grow so fast and are short lived for the most part because of growing so fast, that they never thought a protected slot would be of any benefit or required.
I’ve still think a big fish IS TOO valuable to be kept just to be eatin. Yes you can eat a fish that’s being mounted, but you need your taxidermist to filet it for you, and many don’t want to take the time.
JackOctober 19, 2012 at 4:09 pm #1106297to each their own, I have a few fishing buddies who cringe when I throw the larger ones back in favor of the 16″er. I sure saw some large walleyes on the cleaning table at Devils Lake, a couple I spoke with who live in MN quit fishing in MN because of their “silly” rules. I also see no diference in cleaning a large walleye vs gut hooking a large walleye and have to toss it over the side. I think a lot of us are guilty of the second type of dead walleye.
arklite881southPosts: 5660October 19, 2012 at 4:30 pm #1106303Quote:
If they put size restrictions on pool 3 and 4 do you think the tournaments would go away?
Aaaaah…YES. You can then hold a couple smallie tourneys like us.
October 19, 2012 at 4:48 pm #1106313Quote:
Quote:
Most people let the large fish go because they’re the spawners, not because they taste bad.
Also, you can’t taste the higher level of mercury in the larger fish, but it’s still likely there.
Just my take on it.
x2
Skip the big river eyes and knock back a pack of Marlboro Reds. They’re better for you.
October 19, 2012 at 4:52 pm #1106314Quote:
Tasting great and out of the river don’t normally go hand in hand in my opinion.
Taste is a personal thing. Personally… I will never eat another river walleye, regardless of size, again in my life. After getting away from the river and tasting what a walleye is supposed to taste like from bodies of water like Mille Lacs, LOTW, Devils… the intensity of the flavor (I describe it as a combination of diesel vapors and pine needles) is overwhelming to me. Of course when I was eating nothing but river fish I knew no better.
Again… that’s my personal opinion. Your mileage may vary.
October 19, 2012 at 5:02 pm #1106319Quote:
Quote:
Tasting great and out of the river don’t normally go hand in hand in my opinion.
Taste is a personal thing. Personally… I will never eat another river walleye, regardless of size, again in my life. After getting away from the river and tasting what a walleye is supposed to taste like from bodies of water like Mille Lacs, LOTW, Devils… the intensity of the flavor (I describe it as a combination of diesel vapors and pine needles) is overwhelming to me. Of course when I was eating nothing but river fish I knew no better.
Again… that’s my personal opinion. Your mileage may vary.
Exactly what ^ said!!
Terrible, terrible tasting walleyes! And the catfish are MUCH worse!
jakefroyumPosts: 94October 19, 2012 at 5:10 pm #1106324The big one we ate that I talked about before was on a small Canadian shield lake.
I did have a hillbilly buddy of mine get pissed when I released a 29″ walleye. He said the DNR rules even say they want you to keep 1 walleye over 20″. Not exactly the way I interprete the rule.
October 19, 2012 at 5:15 pm #1106331Quote:
The big one we ate that I talked about before was on a small Canadian shield lake.
I did have a hillbilly buddy of mine get pissed when I released a 29″ walleye. He said the DNR rules even say they want you to keep 1 walleye over 20″. Not exactly the way I interprete the rule.
That’s funny!!
October 19, 2012 at 5:16 pm #1106332Quote:
Quote:
Tasting great and out of the river don’t normally go hand in hand in my opinion.
Taste is a personal thing. Personally… I will never eat another river walleye, regardless of size, again in my life. After getting away from the river and tasting what a walleye is supposed to taste like from bodies of water like Mille Lacs, LOTW, Devils… the intensity of the flavor (I describe it as a combination of diesel vapors and pine needles) is overwhelming to me. Of course when I was eating nothing but river fish I knew no better.
Again… that’s my personal opinion. Your mileage may vary.
I’ve noticed that in the Miss. Not so much the Croix.
October 19, 2012 at 5:18 pm #1106333Got plenty of family member that will not fish with me on pool 2 because of the catch and release restrictions. Not that Im complaining to hard about not fishing with them.
If you want to get the true flavor of a fish try just frying it in butter with salt and pepper or even no seasoning at all.
October 19, 2012 at 5:29 pm #1106344Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Tasting great and out of the river don’t normally go hand in hand in my opinion.
Taste is a personal thing. Personally… I will never eat another river walleye, regardless of size, again in my life. After getting away from the river and tasting what a walleye is supposed to taste like from bodies of water like Mille Lacs, LOTW, Devils… the intensity of the flavor (I describe it as a combination of diesel vapors and pine needles) is overwhelming to me. Of course when I was eating nothing but river fish I knew no better.
Again… that’s my personal opinion. Your mileage may vary.
I’ve noticed that in the Miss. Not so much the Croix.
I can’t weigh in on that… I’ve honest never eaten a walleye from the Croix. When I say “river walleye” I’m referring specifically the Mississippi River… downstream from MPLS / St. Paul.
Palerider77Posts: 630October 19, 2012 at 5:33 pm #1106346My personal slot is 15-20. I like watching the big ones swim away. I would like it if everyone did the same, but I don’t see any need for further legislation ( on anything ).
October 19, 2012 at 6:08 pm #1106360Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Tasting great and out of the river don’t normally go hand in hand in my opinion.
Taste is a personal thing. Personally… I will never eat another river walleye, regardless of size, again in my life. After getting away from the river and tasting what a walleye is supposed to taste like from bodies of water like Mille Lacs, LOTW, Devils… the intensity of the flavor (I describe it as a combination of diesel vapors and pine needles) is overwhelming to me. Of course when I was eating nothing but river fish I knew no better.
Again… that’s my personal opinion. Your mileage may vary.
I’ve noticed that in the Miss. Not so much the Croix.
I can’t weigh in on that… I’ve honest never eaten a walleye from the Croix. When I say “river walleye” I’m referring specifically the Mississippi River… downstream from MPLS / St. Paul.
Seems like every sauger (bottom dweller) I have eaten from anyplace has that flavor. I cant remember what the LOTW saugs tasted like though?
October 19, 2012 at 6:35 pm #1106370Have found the same thing Mike on walleyes kept from around Osceola. They are not to bad. Have eaten plenty from the Mississippi north of Aitkin to and they are pretty good. Not nearly as much mud in the water up that way.
October 19, 2012 at 6:58 pm #1106376How many years do you think it takes for an eye to grow past 30″ on the Miss? I was just thinking about this one in paticular from this last April. It doesn’t look too bad in the pic, but she was pretty beaten up. Can only imagine how much she filtered out of the water in X amount of years
Bassn DanPosts: 977October 19, 2012 at 9:30 pm #1106405The commercially caught and mishandled fish that most restuarants serve makes ANY reasonably fresh fish taste like “the best fish ever” to those that don’t know any different.
October 23, 2012 at 4:53 pm #1106912Quote:
Quote:
Skip the big river eyes and knock back a pack of Marlboro Reds. They’re better for you.
Wow.
You know I was joking, right?
October 23, 2012 at 7:04 pm #1106943Large predators have a lot of toxins due to bio-accumulation…who knows…a pack of Reds might actually be better.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.