Under Armour Controversy

  • David Blais
    Posts: 766
    August 23, 2016 at 4:17 pm #1635551

    Under armour is fairly new to the hunting clothing game. If you read the unbiased reviews and research, it’s below par on scent control. I’m sure they will find a new brand go sponsor them….

    Given that, they obviously must not see the results of a super mag on deer..

    munchy
    NULL
    Posts: 4931
    August 23, 2016 at 4:31 pm #1635555

    It’s UAs choice to do what they want just like its Bowmars choice to legally hunt a certain way. And the consumers choice to buy their products.

    This will be forgotten about by 99% of consumers a year from now. And I doubt there will be long term affects to UA regarding this decision.

    TheFamousGrouse
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts: 11660
    August 23, 2016 at 4:43 pm #1635556

    Seems to me like the Bowmars made a bad business decision and now they’re trying to spin it as Under Armour’s somehow being anti-hunting.

    Here’s the deal, Bomars. When you accept sponsorship money, you now answer to the sponsor for both what you do and how you do it. That’s the way it is because your actions impact the reputation and public perception of the sponsor.

    Maybe I should offer to be a “Will this be a problem?” sponsorship consultant for the hunting and fishing industry. Seems like a much-needed role and a pretty easy gig from my POV. Ummm, you want to kill a bear with a what? No, you headbones, that’s NOT a good idea. Try using a gun or a bow. $5000, please.

    Grouse

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.