Two Lines Back at the Capital in St Paul

  • Matthew Sandys
    Inactive
    Grand Rapids, MN
    Posts: 82
    #1686928

    Does anyone know how we can track track it. Would like to see if they are just giving us false hope and going to crush me or if it will go though?

    Mocha
    Park Rapids
    Posts: 1452
    #1686937

    So two lines will do what? Increase how fast we can catch fish right?

    Lets charge more for not only 2 lines but for higher HP motors….I can get to the best spots faster and cover more spots within my allowed time so I can catch fish faster right? Lets charge more for any boat with 2 chart plotter sonar combos because I will be able to see more bottom structure and bait fish so I will catch fish faster right?

    Why not have any limit on the number of lines, hooks and bait? Just charge for each increase over one!

    You can see Im not in favor of this passing!

    Bass Pundit
    8m S. of Platte/Sullivan Lakes, Minnesocold
    Posts: 1870
    #1687336

    Even though it almost certainly will bring some hassles to me when I’m fishing from shore. I am for it. The fact that we are limited to one line while trolling is stupid.

    Jonesy
    Posts: 1148
    #1687340

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>mark-bruzek wrote:</div>
    I’m sure I will regret this but why so cheap? I think most would pay $10-15 easily, for a second line lic. in MN.

    I don’t think you’re going far enough, actually. Why not 2X the license cost?

    Oh, and non-residents should be limited to one line.

    Grouse

    Sad :'( I just want a 2nd line for trolling. Wisconsin lets me use 3

    Ed Lashyro
    NULL
    Posts: 100
    #1687398

    Is it a money problem or management accountability problem?

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59998
    #1687414

    Depends on who you ask Ed.

Viewing 6 posts - 31 through 36 (of 36 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.