Quote:
Quote:
If it were me I would not shoot the same broadhead that’s already been used but that’s just my own personal preference and ethics…to each his own though!!
X2.
For me it is more for the reason of not knowing if something was damged in the previous use. I spend way too much time, money and sleepless nights every year to have a shooter buck step out and risk the possiblity of losing him or having a bad arrow flight because of a $13.00 decision to re use a broad head or arrow for that matter.
But again, that is just my opinion!
HOWEVER FOR TURKEYS, ANYTHINGS GAME!
Point well-taken regarding the time/energy/dollars we spend only to screw it up with a bent broadhead we couldn’t tell was bent.
Deer are a different animal however and when talking specifically about penetration it’s not an apples-to-apples comparison. Penetration is of the utmost importance with deer, whereas with turkeys some argue that penetration is the enemy, or at least pass-thrus are.
That’s where ethics come in. I’m with you Steve in that I’ll do anything and everything it takes to swiftly kill these birds with the least amount of suffering and lost game possible. The question is more or less do we want the penetration these heads provide with turkeys at typical bow/turkey yardages (~20 yards). There’s still talk (in states where its legal) of adding “stopper” or “grabber” devices to the bases of even massive expandables, as there was in the old days with standard heads. Again, the idea is that there’s simply too much penetration with most broadheads and the arrow completely passes through on many body shots.
Thoughts?
Joel