I hate when they talk about the very severe storm heading for the south metro but only focus the radar for the north metro and don’t even show the rest.
Last night our pet Rochester station showed a radar screen full of red from the Cities down thru Iowa. Rochester showed red. So where were they focused? Iowa. We sure as heck didn’t see any severe weather, so why labor us with all the first alert crap and talk about what can be better addressed by an Iowa based station?
What’s worse, is that here in Rochester with 4 stations that are national, when one does the aleart, they all jump on board and tie up airtime. If there isn’t a tornado around, why can’t they just shut the F up? Ratings. I wish they all knew how stupid they can while trying to word things just a hair different to say the same thing as the other stations. And none of them have any reason to be worrying people when there’s nothing but some weather coming. People have gotten along for decades without all the First Alert mumbo jumbo.
Dang, if these stations see something in the weather that’s going to impact Rochester, then focus on Rochester. Iowa has plenty of TV coverage of their own. Let them deal with their weather. The same for the Twin Cities. Why should Rochester stations declare a Forst Alert , as they are called, then ramble on about the Twin Cities? It seems to me the Twin Cities have more than enough coverage right there.
Thge weather reports during the evening news used to be informative and interesting to watch. Now if a lightning strike happens in Tear Drop Iowa, 400 hundred miles away, we get a first alert and they tie up the regular broadcasting for two hours to explain the occurance. And to tell us what might be happening. It’s all ratings. The more they can justify these events, the higher they can climb in the ratings. Its a pile of crap.