A little background as I think that always helps other chime in on my question.
I’ve owned and shot quite a few different calibers, platforms, and manufacturers as far as handguns go. That being said, I do not have much experience with large revolvers. I have owned a 45LC and .357, but aside from that I don’t have much exposure. Recently, I’ve slimmed down drastically and purchased only 2 different calibers, with the same manufacturer. I purchased two Glocks, G20 and a G27, 10mm full size and .40SW subcompact, respectively. They make perfect sense for my applications. The G27 is my carry in the summer and “light” applications as far as camping in the midwest, and the 10mm for winter carry and out west.
That brings me to my question, do you feel that the 10mm (with 15 round standard mag. and hot loads) is adequate for big game protection through CO, WY, MT, ID, and AK? I typically hunt in one of those places each year, and for me that means backcountry and places far removed from critical emergency care. Despite the ammo prices, I do shoot regularly and feel very comfortable with both weapons.
Not that I’ve got my mind made up, but I’ve looked really closely at the “snub” nose .44, .454 type revolvers that will still carry somewhat comfortably with me wherever I hunt. At this point price is not really going to deter me, especially since most of these revolvers are in the same price range.
I’ve done some research in regards to caliber comparisons, and I realize that a 10mm is quite different from the larger calibers, but that is why I am contemplating the change. I mostly shoot handloads, and known hot loads from Underwood, Bufallo Bore, Black Hills, and the like. Some of these loads are on par with .357, and nearing .41 mag from my understanding.
What are your experiences with the platforms, different manufacturers, and calibers? This will solely be for self protection, whether at home or out west, and not much else. I do have plans on moving west, so I would like to be fully prepared when I get there!