204 Ruger

  • SpinnerDave1
    Posts: 3
    #209948

    I am looking to buy an AR in either 223 or 204. One of my buddies says the barrel of a 204 will burn out fairly quickly. Do the 204s erode the barrels to fast or is that a bad rap?

    Steve Plantz
    SE MN
    Posts: 12240
    #44465

    Welcome to the hunting side of IDO Dave!!!

    I do not know the answer to your question but I am sure that someone will jump in here with an answer soon.

    sipple31
    West Central Sconni
    Posts: 427
    #44483

    Unless the barrel has some sort of goofy rifling, it should not “burn out” any faster than a different caliber.

    Keep in mind how cheap you can get .223 ammo…. I would factor that into the equation.

    good luck!

    SpinnerDave1
    Posts: 3
    #44486

    Thanks Steve Its the same rap the 220 swift got, loads too hot and the barrels can’t take it. Erosion of the barrel leads to accuracy problems down the line. The better performance would be nice but the 223 would be easier on the wallet for sure.

    robby
    Quad Cities
    Posts: 2829
    #44590

    Some calibres do burn out barrels faster than others, no doubt about it. The Swift and .22-250 are well known for this. I do not know about the .204 for sure. It surely is a potent little round though. I can say that .223 unless loaded very hot are known as being pretty easy on bores.

    chris-tuckner
    Hastings/Isle MN
    Posts: 12318
    #44693

    Quote:


    Some calibres do burn out barrels faster than others, no doubt about it. The Swift and .22-250 are well known for this. I do not know about the .204 for sure. It surely is a potent little round though. I can say that .223 unless loaded very hot are known as being pretty easy on bores.


    I have a buddy with a 204 Savage, and it needs to be cleaned a LOT or the accuracy suffers greatly. That high velocity bullet gets very hot very fast, so I would bet barrel wear would be greater.

    SpinnerDave1
    Posts: 3
    #44740

    So I guess That caliber would not be a good choice for a semi auto AR rifle in my opinion. I really should have bought one before now, after the Nov. 4they all went up about 500$. . I will say no more.

    norseman
    FAIRMONT MN
    Posts: 559
    #46172

    WOW! MY NEPHEW BOUGHT A DPS VERSION AR15 AND IS IT A TACK DRIVER!204 WORKS IN THIS GUN FOR SURE. HE’S SHOT 1000’S OF ROUNDS THROUGH IT AT PRAIRIE DOGS WITH NO ILL EFFECTS.HIS WILL SHOOT .5 MOA GROUPS AT 100 YARDS AND 1.5 MOA GROUPS AT 200 YARDS. FOR A SEMI AUTO… THATS A SHOOTER!!!

    riveratt
    Central Wisconsin US-of-A
    Posts: 1464
    #46186

    I absolutely do not buy into burned out barrels regardless of caliber. When properly maintained I do not feel it is possible for an average shooter to fire enough rounds to burn a barrel. And if you do get a new barrel. When you figure how many thousands of rounds it would take to complete such a feat, burning a barrel, replacing one wouldn’t be all that expensive. Want to keep the barrel clean at the range? Carry a Bore Snake. Takes about 15 seconds to clean a barrel. They are flat out amazing!

    chris-tuckner
    Hastings/Isle MN
    Posts: 12318
    #46461

    Exactly!

    Smaller calibers generate a butt load of heat in the barrel leaving copper and lead in the groves. The bullets are so small they cannot disipate or absorb the heat. So the barrels just need to be cleaned more often. Keep ’em clean and they are tack drivers. Shooting the barrels out…I don’t think so.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.