From what I gather the Taurus versus S&W seems to me more of an interal quality issue, Most people will agree S&W makes a higher quality gun, though tauruses usually look very nice, seems the interal components and such are not as refined. Basically it would take more money to bring a Taurus up to a S&W fit and finish than it would for you to buy a smith right off the bat. This is the impression people keep giving me, so take it for what it’s worth.
OK, now that being said, seems they (Taurus) do make guns that work perfect from day one, never an issue, I’ve also seen a fair amount of complaints, mostly on the Customer service once someone sends a gun in, apparently it’s not so great, nor do they always fix the problem the first time or a timely mannor, but they do offer a lifetime warranty…
I guess for me it came down to our smith is used for CC, we bought a revolver because they are the most reliable guns, so we went for the “best” ( in our price range) in .38 the price difference isn’t a whole lot either. In general I got them impression you can’t go wrong with a smith, and a taurus can be hit or miss, generally their revolvers are pretty good though.
Not sure that helps any , my gun experince is very limited, at very least hopefully my impressions will stir some more feedback.