Tell me about reflex sights.

  • suzuki
    Woodbury, Mn
    Posts: 18756
    #1798838

    I know nothing about them. This one seems interesting for use on .22 rifle. What is the advantage/disadvantage between these and red-dot tubes? Thoughts/experience? Thanks.

    http://www.sightmark.com/product.php?item=1013

    Attachments:
    1. SM26031_IMG_MAIN_1000.jpg

    deertracker
    Posts: 9261
    #1798860

    They are easier to shoot with both eyes open. Really easy to get in target with.
    DT

    Ralph Wiggum
    Maple Grove, MN
    Posts: 11764
    #1798861

    Looks like a newer model of one I have on my Neos. It works pretty well. I have never shot a red-dot tube, so I can’t compare for you.

    Attachments:
    1. Neos.jpg

    suzuki
    Woodbury, Mn
    Posts: 18756
    #1798863

    They are easier to shoot with both eyes open. Really easy to get in target with.
    DT

    Can you shoot fine with them? If I cant hit something small at 25-30 or so yds what’s the point?

    deertracker
    Posts: 9261
    #1798865

    My eyes have issues with those heads up sights some times. My eye doesn’t see it as a dot, no more of a line so when I get farther out from the target it tends to cover the target more and hurts my groups some.

    I guess you have to ask yourself what your goal is with it.
    DT

    suzuki
    Woodbury, Mn
    Posts: 18756
    #1798868

    the model I listed has several different reticle options including cross hairs.
    I would hope I could hit a can or rabbit head at short to moderate distances since its going on a .22 rifle. Not for center mass shooting with pistol.

    tornadochaser
    Posts: 756
    #1798871

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>deertracker wrote:</div>
    They are easier to shoot with both eyes open. Really easy to get in target with.
    DT

    Can you shoot fine with them? If I cant hit something small at 25-30 or so yds what’s the point?

    You’ll want to do your research to determine the style and size of the dot/reticle/housing you want for your application. Most reflex sights are 3-6 MOA. I’m a fan of the vortex viper for people who want to try the RMR on a pistol. Like any optic, you get what you pay for, so don’t expect brain shattering clarity through a budget optic. But for the occasional plinker .22 or entry level AR, budget optics from bushnell, primary arms, etc. can be fun shooters.

    Ralph Wiggum
    Maple Grove, MN
    Posts: 11764
    #1798874

    the model I listed has several different reticle options including cross hairs.
    I would hope I could hit a can or rabbit head at short to moderate distances since its going on a .22 rifle. Not for center mass shooting with pistol.

    Mine’s the same–crosshair, dot, circled crosshair, circled dot. I find that I prefer just the dot the majority of the time.

    I don’t know how well it would work on a rifle. It’s kind of neat for a plinker pistol. I can hit a can no problem.

    suzuki
    Woodbury, Mn
    Posts: 18756
    #1798880

    Is this the can you shoot at? Is that 45 MOA? jester

    Attachments:
    1. download.jpg

    Ralph Wiggum
    Maple Grove, MN
    Posts: 11764
    #1798886

    Is this the can you shoot at? Is that 45 MOA?

    LOL. I can hit it from 5 yards almost every time!!!!

    rubberduck
    east bethel
    Posts: 436
    #1798887

    I am a BIG fan of Burris fast fire 3’s.
    3 moa dependable dont break the bank aproxx 250 $+/- from optics planet.
    I have 2 of them one one my SW .460 mag and another on my 45-70 and they take A LOT of pumishment on those 2 guns.

    Lots of options but you get what you pay for.

    Tom Sawvell
    Inactive
    Posts: 9559
    #1798895

    Reflex sights are easy to set up and shoot and seem to take a decent amount of recoil. I had one on a pistol but went back to a scope on it because I think I get better accuracy with hairs that the dot.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.