Ranger 1880MS Angler really……

  • bradl110
    Posts: 276
    #1637905

    http://www.bbcboards.net/showthread.php?t=730982&page=8

    Just came across these pics of the new Ranger 1880MS Angler. After looking at these pictures for the first time I was left scratching my head. First off someone please explain to me the difference between the Angler and the Reata. Looking at the new MS angler I have to admit this is more then a fish and ski vs a fishing boat all. If you are going to make the reata and the angler almost identical why make them both. Here are my negatives coming from the fisherman’s side.

    – The rear deck in the 1880MS has now shrunk since the added a fiberglass separator. Which leaves that back two compartments wasted deck space since you would have to step over the separator. Terrible for the muskie fisherman.

    -The jump seats have handrails close by to lift yourself up (which I believe will just get in the way)

    -In the front and rear it looks like they added some type of padding on the gunnels which will be a nightmare with hooks getting stuck and ripping.

    -Why did they not add the new non stick flooring as they did to the FS series…

    I will admit I’m both a Ranger & Skeeter fan, but I think Ranger totally struck out with this one. I wonder if it has anything to do with the new ownership and the vision they have.

    carver
    West Metro
    Posts: 609
    #1637921

    Looking at the pics here is my opinion. I think the target audience for this boat is the family first, fishing second (should be that all the time really). Maybe a 619FS would be a better choice for some. I’m just lucky that my wife loves to fish so she had some input.

    Personally I never liked jump seats. I had them in my previous boat never used them. I also do not have kids so that is maybe why. Also looking at the tool holders by the jump seats, maybe a non-issue but I foresee kids using that as a step.

    I do agree on the back deck. I think it’s doable but not optimal hence my 619 comment.

    targaman
    Inactive
    Wilton, WI
    Posts: 2759
    #1637948

    I think it looks sweet

    CaptainMusky
    Posts: 22230
    #1637969

    I don’t think those handles are there to pull yourself up, but to use as the holy poop handle as you race across the lake.
    I think it looks good to me and I’m just a guy who thinks rangers are overpriced but it looks like a good rig.

    mattgroff
    Posts: 585
    #1638007

    Sweet looking boat. But take that stupid full windshield off and put on the single ones. Just my opinion.

    Pete Bauer
    Stillwater, MN
    Posts: 2599
    #1638035

    At least you can finally put a 200 on it.

    Buffalo Bill
    Posts: 19
    #1645859

    Only a 4 cylinder 200 though from what I read which eliminates some popular options.

    bradl110
    Posts: 276
    #1645864

    Only a 4 cylinder 200 though from what I read which eliminates some popular options.

    I saw that too. Man that thing would be awesome with the 6 cylinder 200 VRod.

    Any Idea when this will be available to look at.

    Ronald K. Smrz
    Posts: 18
    #1670727

    It would be nice if Merc came out with the long rumored 175/200 versions based on the normal aspirated 150 4 cylinder. Yamaha has them based on it’s 4 cylinder 150 so why not Merc? Unless they are worried that they would put their 4 cylinder Verado 175/200 out to pasture like the normal aspirated 150 did to the Verado 150

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.