Quote:
THERE WAS AN EXTENSIVE STUDY ON GAME BIRD MORTALITY AT THE WILDLIFE RESEARCH STATION IN MADELIA MN. THEY EVEN WENT SO FAR AS COMPAREING 2 TYPES OF WETLANDS. ONE WITH DEAD TREES (DUTCH ELM TREES) AND ONE WITHOUT. THE WETLAND WITHOUT HAD OVER TWICE THE PRODUCTION RATE THAN THE ONES WITH TREES. THE CULPRIT OWLS AND HAWKS. ONCE THE DEAD AND DIEING TREES FELL DOWN PRODUCTION RETURNED TO AVERAGE LEVELS. DENNIS SIMON HEAD RESEARCHER AT THE RESEARCH STATION , THAT HEADED THIS STUDY,CONCLUDED AFTER 5 YEARS THAT THE BIGGEST ENEMY OF UPLAND GAME BIRDS ARE #1OWLS #2HAWKS #3FARM CATS #4 SKUNKS #5RACOONS #6 WEATHER SO…… I LOVE HUNTING FOX AND HAVE PROBABLY HARVESTED MORE THAN MOST BUT WHEN IT COMES TO BLAME I HAVE TO BELIEVE A WILDLIFE RESEARCHER NOT OLD WIVES TALES. IT STANDS TO REASON THAT WHEN THE FOX HAD THE MANGE AND WERE ALMOST EXTINCT HERE THE PHEASANTS WOULD OF HAD A POPULATION EXPLOSION. NOT! TOO MANY OTHERS TO BLAME.
One must always remember that studies are subject to conditions. Any good ol’ boy with time on his hands can pick two areas, monitor it for 5yrs and conclude a trend or percentage of things observed. However, do we know that fox populate all areas equally? Of course not and we know it’s not so. If one hunter’s area is low on owls and hawks but high on 4 legged predators, the percentage of who does what is going to change. Skunks and coons are egg stealers vs attack predators like a fox or coyote. The impact is going to be different simply because the quarry is a whole different game. Lower the coon and skunk numbers in an area and again the percentages change.
You can conclude concrete belief in studies or realize that studies are mostly indicators and are often less than 100% accurate in application to all areas. On one hand we have a hunter witnessing predation and using that as justification for his decision. It really doesn’t matter if an owl or hawk is harder on game birds, fact is, it happened.
Would you believe a bald eagle will eat carrion? How about snatch a gossling from it’s nest with a parent present? I witnessed both events within 3 months of a study “proving” that fish dependent eagles, such as the bald eagle, must have productive, sustained fisheries in order to survive. Without the availability of fish, these eagles will inevitably die, simply because they eat nothing else. Well……..a bald eagle, pecking and ripping away on deer carcus is certainly uncommon to see…..but that bird was breaking the rules! Watching a soaring bald eagle drop on a Canadian Goose nest and spring out of it with a gossling in it’s talons has never been shown on any film or documentary I’ve ever seen…..but it shows evidence that the “fish eagles” aren’t helpless and can be resourceful.
The fact is that regardless of a study, the action was witnessed to exist, therefore disqualifying it as an old wives tale.