Well…………….let’s see what stirring of the pot this creates…………
Dilemma………….High buck/high performance vs. economics.
Sadly, “economics” are often thought of as “savings”. Not so. It’s the most bang for the buck over the long haul.
Now, I realize my experience is different than other people’s experience so realize I’m drawing off my own results and observations and this has no reflection on anything else, someone else may have for their findings.
But, I have broken a good number of cheap graphite rods and when they go, they’re done. By the time you get through a WalMart or Fleet Farm (or retailer with cheaper rods that are routinely available), anyone who’s put a good day’s use into a good number of the offerings are typically looking for something in the $30 range or higher for their preferred equipment.
Now, compared to the “Cadillacs”, there’s a big price hike but a vast difference in feel and comfort. Just like there’s a difference between my little Escort and my uncle’s Cadillac. Do they both transport? Yes. But does one have a better feel? Yes. Smoother? Yes. Quieter? Yes.
The differences continue yet the only thing the Cadillac does better is in the area of comfort. Thus, the spendy fishin’ poles. It’s in the feel. The comfort.
Now, I’ve broken more cheap rods than spendy ones so my economic spread sheet asks this question:
“If I could buy a Cadillac once, and if it ever broke down in my lifetime, I could have it replaced with a brand new one for the price of an Escort, would I buy one?” 
My results have a 5 to 1 cheap to spendy breakage ratio. How many “Escort’s” do I want to own, only to keep buying more “Escort’s”, when a “Cadillac” is available for the same price after the initial purchase?
I break a rod almost annually. Careless or whatever the reason, I do. So, given the 10 years of “cheap rods” @ $30/each, That’s $300.00. An Avid is half that, and if replaced twice for $40/each, that’s still $230.00 overall and you’re “driving a Cadillac” vs. an “Escort”. 
Again, this is how it applies to a rod junky’s pocketbook.
Lifetime warranties go a LONG way in the long run and on long “trips” or outings………..I’d rather “fish” with a “Cadillac”. 
But, what if I only use “Caddys” and I still break one every year? There goes the economics………..right? Numerically,………………yes. The argument then changes to preference only. Affordability shouldn’t be an issue because if 25% over “Escort” retail is a money issue, then I’ve made some bad choices somewhere along the way. I still look at this as driving a Cadillac vs. an Escort. If I totalled the car I drive on an annual basis, I’d still choose to drive a Cadillac if the price was within 25% of an Escort. Why? Well, if an Escort is $100……….would you choose a Cadillac if you could get it for $125?? There’s far more than a 25% increase in quality and feel…………….and resale if I don’t like it.