Pack vs. Queens

Brent Hundley 12 of 25 for 87 yards.

http://www.espn.com/blog/green-bay-packers/post/_/id/41640/brett-hundley-makes-plays-with-his-feet-but-not-his-arm-in-packers-loss

BigWerm wrote:

Brent Hundley 12 of 25 for 87 yards.

http://www.espn.com/blog/green-bay-packers/post/_/id/41640/brett-hundley-makes-plays-with-his-feet-but-not-his-arm-in-packers-loss

Knew it was gonna be ugly, but didn’t think it could be THAT ugly. Leading receiver for the packers had 17 yards, Jordy and Adams combined for 25. Hundley will get a lot of blame, as he should, but I’m hoping McCarthy takes the most heat. Packers run an elementary minded offense that Rodgers has masked for years. Woof.

Prediction; if the Packers manage to stay in contention for the division and stay close, you will See #12 back on the field for the Vikings game in GoatBay with a chip on his shoulder.
Pun intended!

Walleyestudent Andy Cox wrote:

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>eelpoutguy wrote:</div>
But I’ve been drinking German beer at Octoberfest at Rutgers.
Thinkin about buying some lederhosens.

10:58 AM?…Well you’re getting an early start on the day.

You can’t drink all day if you don’t start in the morning

BigWerm wrote:

Brent Hundley 12 of 25 for 87 yards.

http://www.espn.com/blog/green-bay-packers/post/_/id/41640/brett-hundley-makes-plays-with-his-feet-but-not-his-arm-in-packers-loss

…and it came against possibly the worst defense in the league.

Having all their eggs in one basket…well, the chickens have come home to roost.

I do hope Rodgers is back for the Dec. 23rd game in lambeau.

belletaine wrote:

I do hope Rodgers is back for the Dec. 23rd game in lambeau.

The GoatBay fans would be in a state of euphoria over the QB savior back in action, and oh boy would he want to stick it to the Vikings D. I don’t think the Vikes D or #55 would be allowed to come within breathing distance of the Golden Boy. The NFL Top brass would have the refs carrying extra flags to insure the safety of #12.
That would be a fun game, one of those games the NFL networks would be salivating over.

I always thought that crickets hibernated in the winter but boy they are chirping in here SKOL

reelman wrote:

I don’t think the Vikes D or #55 would be allowed to come within breathing distance of the Golden Boy. The NFL Top brass would have the refs carrying extra flags to insure the safety of #12.

Can’t you just enjoy your team being in first place? Even with #12 sidelined you seem preoccupied with the the ridiculous notion that the deck is stacked against MN, or in favor of GB.

crappie55369 wrote:

I always thought that crickets hibernated in the winter but boy they are chirping in here SKOL

You’re posting on a thread about a 2-week-old game. Maybe move on and enjoy the success of your team? I think Pack fans have said all they can say in this one.

pool2fool wrote:

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>reelman wrote:</div>
I don’t think the Vikes D or #55 would be allowed to come within breathing distance of the Golden Boy. The NFL Top brass would have the refs carrying extra flags to insure the safety of #12.

Can’t you just enjoy your team being in first place? Even with #12 sidelined you seem preoccupied with the the ridiculous notion that the deck is stacked against MN, or in favor of GB.

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>crappie55369 wrote:</div>
I always thought that crickets hibernated in the winter but boy they are chirping in here SKOL

You’re posting on a thread about a 2-week-old game. Maybe move on and enjoy the success of your team? I think Pack fans have said all they can say in this one.

Foolish Fool you seem to think you are the guardian of IDO posting.
The comment was about The game on DEC 23rd in GoatBay, move on to something else if you don’t like it.

Any fool should be able accomplish that.
Or are you just out to enhance your moniker?

@reelman Maybe try responding to the comment that was directed to you? And if you can’t make a point without making it personal it usually means your point was flimsy to begin with. I’m curious as to why you’re already manufacturing an excuse in the unlikely event that Rodgers comes back for the December game. You have it all locked and loaded to blame the refs. Care to answer or just hurl insults?

I don’t see anything specific about the December game anywhere in crappies’ post, just pointing out the crickets in a thread about a game that’s over & done with. Of course vikes fans are still all about this thread because that 2-week old victory will likely be the highlight of the season when all is said & done.

pool2fool wrote:

You’re posting on a thread about a 2-week-old game. Maybe move on and enjoy the success of your team? I think Pack fans have said all they can say in this one.

pool2fool wrote:

Maybe try responding to the comment that was directed to you? And if you can’t make a point without making it personal it usually means your point was flimsy to begin with. I’m curious as to why you’re already manufacturing an excuse in the unlikely event that Rodgers comes back for the December game. You have it all locked and loaded to blame the refs. Care to answer or just hurl insults?

Apparently you can’t follow your own advise and avoid commenting,your very own name and subsequent words proves It Never pays to argue with a fool.

I’m going to break out the German beer and sauerbraten tonight if this thread keeps heatin up like this.

reelman wrote:

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>pool2fool wrote:</div>
You’re posting on a thread about a 2-week-old game. Maybe move on and enjoy the success of your team? I think Pack fans have said all they can say in this one.

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>pool2fool wrote:</div>
Maybe try responding to the comment that was directed to you? And if you can’t make a point without making it personal it usually means your point was flimsy to begin with. I’m curious as to why you’re already manufacturing an excuse in the unlikely event that Rodgers comes back for the December game. You have it all locked and loaded to blame the refs. Care to answer or just hurl insults?

Apparently you can’t follow your own advise and avoid commenting,your very own name and subsequent words proves It Never pays to argue with a fool.

Ha. Still no answer. Just more super clever attacks based on my screen name. Awesome!

So let me make sure I understand you, kiddo. Only people who agree with you are allowed to post comments or question on this thread? Wait, I think I’ve heard this one before. . .

Why would the 4-10 Pack want to bring Erynn back for a game and risk him suffering a career ending injury?

pool2fool wrote:

crappie55369 wrote:
I always thought that crickets hibernated in the winter but boy they are chirping in here SKOL
You’re posting on a thread about a 2-week-old game. Maybe move on and enjoy the success of your team? I think Pack fans have said all they can say in this one.

Im still gloating on this one because in our history we have so few victories. Im not afraid to admit it, the Packers have had the better of us more often then not in the last 25 years. Its not often a Vikings fan gets to gloat and im taking full advantage. Its a shame it had to come at the expense of a player getting injured but HOF quarterbacks don’t grow on trees and the Packers have one and we don’t. So you can call me a poor sport if you wish but at the end of the day you can go home and enjoy your teams championship trophy while we can only make salty jabs here and there on internet forums so I imagine you can live with it

pool2fool wrote:

Still no answer. Just more super clever attacks based on my screen name. Awesome!

More of your foolish advise,you can not take your own words and abide by them, you have proven to everyone which each and every keystroke that you live feverishly up to your name.

You shall have a private tour of the Pitt of misery.(aka:GoatBay)
Dilly Dilly

crappie55369 wrote:

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>pool2fool wrote:</div>
crappie55369 wrote:
I always thought that crickets hibernated in the winter but boy they are chirping in here SKOL
You’re posting on a thread about a 2-week-old game. Maybe move on and enjoy the success of your team? I think Pack fans have said all they can say in this one.

Im still gloating on this one because in our history we have so few victories. Im not afraid to admit it, the Packers have had the better of us more often then not in the last 25 years. Its not often a Vikings fan gets to gloat and im taking full advantage. Its a shame it had to come at the expense of a player getting injured but HOF quarterbacks don’t grow on trees and the Packers have one and we don’t. So you can call me a poor sport if you wish but at the end of the day you can go home and enjoy your teams championship trophy while we can only make salty jabs here and there on internet forums so I imagine you can live with it

That’s a totally fair and honest response!

Maybe you and @reelman should switch monikers. A real man owns his actions and words and answers questions directly and fairly. Hats off to you. And pants down ( )to the other guy who still won’t admit his inferiority complex and is still busy typing up a draft of his excuses just in case the bottom falls outta this season for the Vikings.

pool2fool wrote:

I’d say Pack 56-3 sounds about right?

Ok fine 42-3.

awwe were still hurting aren’t we little fool

reelman wrote:

awwe were still hurting aren’t we little fool

OH! You got me! Oh wait. . .

pool2fool wrote:

No tears here. Tough football play, disastrous result for GB.

pool2fool wrote:

Vikes outplayed the pack no ifs/ands/buts about it. Had no problem with the hit by Barr. If it’s Matthews making hit and it draws a flag I’m saying “man I miss the days of real football,” so I’ll extend that same attitude both ways.

reelman wrote:

awwe were still hurting aren’t we little fool

How much longer will the moderators allow insults and derision to be disguised in the name smack talking??

reelman wrote:

awwe were still hurting aren’t we little fool

Mudshark wrote:

How much longer will the moderators allow insults and derision to be disguised in the name smack talking??

Meh, I have thick skin and apparently it’s fair game because I’m the smarty pants who put it in his username. Honestly, I could care less and I think the moderators have bigger fish to fry.

Besides — He went back to that same zinger 4 times in the last 2 hours! That speaks volumes.

Awwwe another GoatBay fan chimes in, don’t worry you’ll get over it.
Now hike up your green and gold skirts and move on.

reelman wrote:

Awwwe another GoatBay fan chimes in, don’t worry you’ll get over it.
Now hike up your green and gold skirts and move on.

Easy there killer. We may be on different sides of the proverbial fence but no reason to be so coarse

belletaine wrote:

I do hope Rodgers is back for the Dec. 23rd game in lambeau.

reelman wrote:

The GoatBay fans would be in a state of euphoria over the QB savior back in action, and oh boy would he want to stick it to the Vikings D. I don’t think the Vikes D or #55 would be allowed to come within breathing distance of the Golden Boy. The NFL Top brass would have the refs carrying extra flags to insure the safety of #12.
That would be a fun game, one of those games the NFL networks would be salivating over.

Here
This is for you two Golden Girls.
It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
Apparently it’s to difficult for you two Eryn idolers to scroll back and read prior to your sorry but typical rebuttal.

@reelman What are you even talking about? Are you high?

Did you miss my post where I directly quoted that exact post of yours? Of course I read it. This is hilarious, it’s like talking to a night crawler.

Have another (dozen)

Not to hi-jack this post but page 8 of this thread is just about pi-s-s your pants funny. Keep it up boys. Ding ding ding, round 2…….

pool2fool wrote:

@reelman What are you even talking about? Are you high?

Did you miss my post where I directly quoted that exact post of yours? Of course I read it. This is hilarious, it’s like talking to a night crawler.

Have another (dozen)

Before Pool2 speaks it is always safe to assume that he is a fool. After he speaks, it is seldom necessary to assume it.

Ahh, but he is educated.

This thread going out in glorious fashion….

And @reelman is up to 6 impressive jabs using of the word “fool” — I’m putting the over/under at 13. PM me if you want in on the action.

Dutchboy wrote:

Ahh, but he is educated.

Maybe I have a PhD, maybe I dropped out of high school. You wouldn’t know because you don’t know me, but don’t let that get in the way. You seem to get a kick out of spewing negativity in the direction of those who have disagreed with you or voiced an unpopular opinion on another thread. I hope it’s rewarding for you!