It’s a cost savings to taxpayers…or could be if districts found a way out of bussing. Paying only some to not ride is probably a break even at best. If a district could pay everyone to provide their own transportation, they’d save a big chunk of change.
For example, the local district here has an annual bussing contract of right around $1.5 million with about 1100 students in the district. There are also add-ons for field trips, extra curriculars, etc. This comes out to a cost of over $1300 per student. If they could hand every family $1000 per child and eliminate bussing for all but a select few students, they’d stand to save the district taxpayers over $360,000 per year.
Now before you go off about how “dumb” the contracts are or blame districts, keep in-mind most of the bussing companies in rural MN areas are the only option for multiple communities. It’s an industry with minimal competition. A new bus can cost close to 6 figures, so it’s no longer economical for districts to own their own given the costs up front.
If I had ~$10 million laying around, a fleet of busses and some pole buildings strategically located could make me a hell of a return on my investment. Unfortunately the drivers for these companies are working for next to nothing, while the owners and investors are sticking it to the taxpayers.