News on Mille Lacs Walleye Overage

  • biggill
    East Bethel, MN
    Posts: 11321
    #1797764

    Angler surveys show walleye overage can be paid back on Lake Mille Lacs

    September 14, 2018

    Lake Mille Lacs angler survey results show that state anglers have taken walleye at levels far enough under the state’s safe harvest allocation to pay back a harvest overage accumulated in 2016 and 2017, according to the Department of Natural Resources.

    The survey results through the end of August indicate catch rates were still quite good this summer, but were lower than last year.

    DNR experts say the lower catch rates are consistent with reports from anglers of seeing more baitfish, as catch rates decline with increases in small-fish forage for bigger fish.

    “It’s good news that walleye anglers had lots of success on Mille Lacs and that we were able to stay under the state’s allocation,” said DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr.

    The latest survey estimates include walleye harvested by state anglers in the winter, and in the summer those that died after being caught and released. This is a condition known as hooking mortality. During this time anglers took 42,396 pounds of walleye.

    Cooler water temperatures and the normal decline in fishing pressure that occur in the fall indicate that total kill for the year will likely remain under 50,000 pounds of walleye, well below the state’s safe harvest level allocation of 87,800 pounds.

    In 2016 and 2017, state anglers exceeded the allowable harvest by a combined 16,050 pounds and those overages needed to be accounted for in a future year. Since the 2018 state angler kill is well under the allowable harvest, the overage will be eliminated.

    Walleye safe harvest level for Lake Mille Lacs is determined annually, based on population status, and predictions of how harvest will affect the walleye population in the future. The safe harvest level is divided between the 1837 Treaty Bands and state anglers. By agreement, the Bands and the state are required to monitor harvest by their members.

    “Although the state and the Bands did not reach agreement on safe harvest level for this year, a kill of 50,000 pounds will be well below allocation regardless of whether safe harvest level is 150,000 or 120,000 pounds,” Parsons said.

    The DNR is conducting its standard fall fish community assessments through September. The DNR’s angler creel survey runs through Oct. 31. The agency will announce its winter walleye regulations in early November.

    Angler survey results and more information about Lake Mille Lacs can be found on the DNR website at mndnr.gov/millelacslake.

    MNdrifter
    Posts: 1671
    #1797770

    Soooo……. Non band members should have 21,750#’s added to this winters catch. Maybe let some fisherman take a fish home. Even if you have to send in or maybe win some kind of lottery or something. I’m glad we are under. I don’t like owing anybody anything.

    Kyhl
    Savage
    Posts: 749
    #1797884

    Soooo……. Non band members should have 21,750#’s added to this winters catch. Maybe let some fisherman take a fish home. Even if you have to send in or maybe win some kind of lottery or something. I’m glad we are under. I don’t like owing anybody anything.

    The allocation season ends 11/30. The winter total will come from next year’s allocation which begins 12/1.

    Btw, there has been a one fish limit in the winter for the last couple of seasons. Hopefully that continues with a one or two fish limit next summer.

    gimruis
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 17508
    #1797886

    The overage from previous years was when our Governor decided to “keep it open” when he shouldn’t have. I’m not going to make this conversation political, but politicians need to keep their hands out of resource management. Let the biologists do their jobs.

    Kyhl
    Savage
    Posts: 749
    #1797892

    The overage issue was a crock to begin with. I never understood the point. Think of same same scenario using your bank account and budget.

    You measure your bank balance in September and set a budget for the following year. Over the next year you can’t see the balance until the next budgeting cycle in September. You have a known balance as a starting point and expect to take in so much income over the next year. This creates an allowed amount that you can spend over the next year. Your budget.

    Over the next year you end up exceeding you budget by 20%. Guess you will have to make that up next year by not spending as much?

    The second September you get to see your budget and learn that it increased. Does it matter where what caused the source of the increase? It is nice to know however that knowledge does not affect the next budget cycle.
    It could be from more income (prior hatch).
    It could be that the previous balance was wrong.
    It could be that you really didn’t spend as much as you thought (harvest).

    It doesn’t really matter where the problem occurred. You now have a new starting point based on the current balance. If the current balance is double the prior balance do you really need to replace that previous overspend?

    It is a stupid idea that only a politician could dream up.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.