Perhaps…. part of the price is paying for warranty like their open water rods?
That’s no excuse though. My TUCR’s also have a 5 year warranty and they were $40 cheaper (and I don’t have to shell out 40 additional dollars for shipping a warranty claim, which I’ve never had to use fwiw). As a matter of fact, they resemble TUCR’s a lot too.
I think St. Croix is trying to flex their marketing muscles on this one and appeal to their die-hard customers. Most guys I know are hardpressed to spend more than $20 on any combo let alone $90+ on a true custom rod (sans reel). I don’t see a $130-$160 non-customizable “custom” rod selling very well to 90% of ice anglers. However, I do see them being irresponsibly handled by employees and a lot of customers then being put back in exchange for a $10 ice blues. Then, when someone does buy one, it will probably break from being previously handled poorly and that guy is going to have to pay more for a warranty service (I see it far too often at my local outdoor store). Especially after the 100th guy of the day flexes that REC spinning guide. SNAP!
Putting REC guides and a split grip handle on an ice rod then charging $130+ doesn’t make it “custom”. I think they are relying too much on their namesake on this one.
Like I said, I just don’t get it. I think it’s the use of the word “custom”. Which still doesn’t justify the price.