I copied the following from a poster on Huskerpedia. I guess what got me going was all the recruiting talk now.
Starters in Saturday’s game are marked with a *, Big 12 Honors are from the Coaches Team)
OU 2002 CLASS (#7 national Rivals ranking)
*LB-Alexander, Rufus (BIG 12 DEFENSIVE PLAYER OF THE YEAR, ALL BIG 12 FIRST TEAM)
*LT-Messner, Chris (ALL BIG 12 FIRST TEAM)
*DE-Birdine, Larry (ALL BIG 12 FIRST TEAM)
*QB-Thompson, Paul (ALL BIG 12 HON. MENT.)
*LB-Latimer, Zach (ALL BIG 12 HON. MENT.)
*DE-Thibodeaux, Calvin
NU 2002 CLASS (#40 national Rivals ranking)
*DE-Carriker, Adam (BIG 12 D-LINEMAN OF THE YEAR, ALL BIG 12 FIRST TEAM)
*FB-Todd, Dane (ALL BIG 12 FIRST TEAM)
*DE-Moore, Jay (ALL BIG 12 SECOND TEAM)
*LB-Bradley, Stewart (walk-on) (ALL BIG 12 HON. MENT.)
*S-Shanle, Andrew (ALL BIG 12 HON. MENT.)
*TE-Herian, Matt
Each team has 6 starters & 0 reserves from the 2002 class who played Saturday. OU’s 02 class has slightly better all-league “honors”, with 3 First-Team selections & 2 Honorable Mentions. NU’s 02 class has 2 First-Team selections, 1 Second-Team selection & 2 Honorable Mentions. (Plus, you’d have to think a healthy Kurt Mann & a 100% Matt Herian would’ve been up for league honors – tough season for both of those seniors.) Regardless of the slight edge OU has in league honored players, it’s hardly the type of talent difference you’d expect from a ranking of 7th vs 40th.
Now the 03 classes. Again, these listings are the players from those classes who played Saturday, starters have a *.
OU 2003 CLASS (#4 national Rivals ranking)
*DT-Coleman, Steven (ALL BIG 12 HON. MENT.)
*TE-Finley, Joe Jon (ALL BIG 12 HON. MENT.)
*S-Williams, Darien (ALL BIG 12 HON. MENT.)
*FB-Zaslaw, Dane
RB-Gutierrez, Jacob
LB-Baker, Lewis
DE-Dotson, Alonzo
LB-Pleasant, Demarrio
NU 2003 CLASS (#42 national Rivals ranking)
*LB-Ruud, Bo (ALL BIG 12 FIRST TEAM)
*C-Byford, Brett (ALL BIG 12 HON. MENT.)
*LB-McKeon, Corey (ALL BIG 12 HON. MENT.)
*S-Green, Tierre
*TE-Phillips, JB
*LT-Patrick, Chris
TE-Mueller, Josh
OU’s 2003 class had 4 starters Saturday and another 4 reserves, while NU’s 2003 class had 6 starters Saturday and 1 reserve. NU’s 03 class has the slightly better all-league “honors” this time, with 1 First-Team selection & 2 Honorable Mentions. OU’s 03 class has three honored players, too, all 3 Honorable Mention, though. Again, hardly the type of talent difference you’d expect from a ranking of 4th vs 42nd.
Sorry, I don’t have time to run the same information for the 04 & 05 classes today. But I think the 02 & 03 classes are the most interesting to study, because of the extremely large gap in Rivals rankings.
Was OU the more talented team Saturday? Almost certainly, although not to the degree that the 02 and 03 Rivals rankings might lead one to believe. There are many factors that go into a win or loss. IMO, it’s too simplistic to say talent was the overriding factor, especially when trying to evaluate a talent difference based on rankings that are almost 4 and 5 years old.
Finally, I find it disappointing that some fans would continue to insinuate that NU’s juniors and seniors don’t have talent, based solely on Rivals rankings that are 4 and 5 years old. These players have given years of dedication and countless hours of work to the NU program. They’ve worked through system changes and coaching changes, but have chosen to stick with the Huskers. Some of them – Greg Austin, 03 recruiting class – have literally given their bodies to the Husker program to the detriment of their future health. And several have proven their talent on the field, having received All Big 12 honors last week – both OU & NU had 8 players from the 02 & 03 classes honored by the league’s coaches & NU actually had more All Big 12 First & Second Team selections from those two classes than OU, 4 to 3. Yet some fans want to degrade their abilities and give them a stigma because of some Rivals team rankings attached to the players’ signing class from when they were in high school. It’s puzzling.