Perhaps this information, taken right form a recent fly fishing magazine article from Paul Downing entitled The Logic of Limits, will shed some light on why new proposals on area trout streams want to eliminate bait usage.
“There have been three major studies of hook mortality for trout in recent years, A 1992 survey by Taylor and White (“A Meta-analysis of hooking mortality of nonanadromous trout” from North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 12:760-767) reported the following average catch-and-release hook mortality by angling method:
Bait, barbed hooks: 33.5%
Bait, barbless hooks: 8.4%
Flies and lures, barbed hooks: 4.8%
Flies and lures, barbless hooks: 2.6%
“The major cause of hook mortality is damage to the gills and other vital organs from deep hooking,”
“A 1996 study by Schisler and Bergeson (“Postrelease Hooking Mortality of Rainbow caught on Scented Artificial Bait,” from the North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 16:570-578) monitored 1473 fish caught in stocked ponds by flies, actively fished artificial scented baits, and passively fished artificial scented baits. The artificial bait used for the study was the Power Egg This study did not include worm fishing or artificial lures. The average hook mortalities in this studey were:
Artificial bait, fished passively: 32.1%
Artificial bait, fished actively: 21.6%
Fly-caught fish 3.9%
Just some food for thought and perhaps some insight into the rationale for making streams catch and release with no bait allowed.