MNF: Bears v Vikings

  • Sylvanboat
    Posts: 1000
    #2304442

    Could we be looking at the upset of the season? Go Bears!!!

    BigWerm
    SW Metro
    Posts: 11817
    #2304445

    Not sure what would give you that impression, was it the Bears giving up the most yards in a half (319), while having the fewest yards (4) in a half ever last week? It’s going to be a white out at the Bank, and I’ll be there losing my voice! Letssssss go!

    buckybadger
    Upper Midwest
    Posts: 8327
    #2304448

    Vikings -6.5 is a bargain.

    If this was in Chicago I’d maybe entertain a Bears cover…but no way do I think the Bears are slowing down the Vikings offense at home.

    Minnesota 34, Chicago 20

    JEREMY
    BP
    Posts: 3955
    #2304449

    I get to say it. Trap game

    BigWerm
    SW Metro
    Posts: 11817
    #2304450

    I get to say it. Trap game

    I’m going to wait for BassPundit’s psychological breakdown of the trap game potential, 60% of the time he’s right every time!

    Bearcat89
    North branch, mn
    Posts: 20707
    #2304453

    Bears big upset. That’s the kind of games the likes throw away fast

    fishthumper
    Sartell, MN.
    Posts: 12021
    #2304456

    It would be a upset, but I don’t think its going to happen. Then again, from week to week you never know what team is going to show up with these 2 teams. The difference is that Minnesota has been finding ways to win and the bears been finding ways to lose.

    Bass Pundit
    8m S. of Platte/Sullivan Lakes, Minnesocold
    Posts: 1842
    #2304465

    If I were the Bears coaching staff, I would be targeting next week’s game at home vs. the Lions for the upset of the season. Coming into MN after the show the Vikes put on for their fans last week, the Vikes team is hot and fan base are going to be charged up on Monday night. Your squad has a much better shot at winning at home vs. that beat-up Lions D. That is the smart strategic move.

    I thought the Bears should have thrown the final game of the season in 2018/19 when they played the Vikes at home. Instead, they won a meaningless game and got beat the following week at home in the first round of the playoffs by the Eagles.

    If Da Bears are smart, they will be playing this week to win next week versus a more vulnerable team in front of their fans. That means plugging in their 2nd and 3rd stringers as if they were starters this week and sprinkling in the starters with individual pitch counts per player, much like how the Vikes have been handling Aaron Jones the past couple of games.

    blank
    Posts: 1784
    #2304468

    Why not play to win every week?

    Save the “lose for a better draft pick” garbage.

    CaptainMusky
    Posts: 23165
    #2304473

    Why not play to win every week?

    Save the “lose for a better draft pick” garbage.

    Right, any team I cheer for I hate the talk of tanking or planning to lose. Just seems dumb, these guys are pros and their jobs are on the line players and coaches included.

    Matt Moen
    South Minneapolis
    Posts: 4357
    #2304476

    That analysis makes absolutely no sense. They need to rest starters this week to try and win the next? Why can’t they try and win both weeks?

    The only thing the Bears are playing for is pride and to impact other teams seasons. I’ll bet the Bears would love to beat the Vikes and Lions and see neither get the 1 seed. I don’t think they win either game but to hypothesize they aren’t going to try is absurd.

    Bass Pundit
    8m S. of Platte/Sullivan Lakes, Minnesocold
    Posts: 1842
    #2304479

    Why not play to win every week?

    Save the “lose for a better draft pick” garbage.

    It’s called using leverage to your advantage. Playing smarter means you can play harder when you are in the most advetageous position or at the most critical moment. Strategy 101. If you fail to think that way as the Bears did in 18/19 it has real costs. You can only get away from bad fundamentals in strategy for so long. Especially against superior teams or peers.

    Winning in NFL Football is a marathon not a sprint.

    BigWerm
    SW Metro
    Posts: 11817
    #2304483

    That analysis makes absolutely no sense. They need to rest starters this week to try and win the next? Why can’t they try and win both weeks?

    The only thing the Bears are playing for is pride and to impact other teams seasons. I’ll bet the Bears would love to beat the Vikes and Lions and see neither get the 1 seed. I don’t think they win either game but to hypothesize they aren’t going to try is absurd.

    Let the man cook Matt! I love your strategery BP, it only doesn’t make sense to people who refuse to look at things in the 4th or even 5th dimension. Keep on keeping on man! toast rotflol

    ganderpike
    Alexandria
    Posts: 1111
    #2304490

    These sports threads are getting pretty good. Got Gim dropping bombs on Packer fans and BP puffin the whole thing.

    Attachments:
    1. IMG_4981.jpeg

    Bass Pundit
    8m S. of Platte/Sullivan Lakes, Minnesocold
    Posts: 1842
    #2304500

    Let me put it in BP’s % where I see things sitting right now.

    The Bears have a 10 to 15% chance of beating the Vikes

    And the Bears have 35% to 40% chance of beating the Lions at home

    If they give their all in a losing attempt to beat the Vikes, then the % fall to 20 to 25% to beat the Lions. If they beat the Vikes they fall to 25 to 35% to beat the Lions. Really laying it on the line against the Vikes is wasting valuable ammunition. Throwing good money after bad. It’s strategic stupidity. You come to MN, go through the motions, and live to fight on the day when the odds are more favorable to your squad. The Lions are more vulnerable than the Vikings right now. It’s obvious.If they are smart they will lean into where their chances are best. That is my argument and it is sound.

    TheFamousGrouse
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts: 11760
    #2304501

    The Vikes are going to remember what happened last game and go pedal to the metal. No way are they going to want to let the Bad News Bears hang around again and risk another disaster. Also, anyone who thinks the Vikes won’t want to use this game to send a message is crazy. No team is ever going to admit to doing this and there’s absolutely no team that wouldn’t want to do it given the situation.

    JEREMY
    BP
    Posts: 3955
    #2304502

    What will really suck is when the Bills beat the Lions Sunday then the Vikes fall to the Bears.

    blank
    Posts: 1784
    #2304509

    Let me put it in BP’s % where I see things sitting right now.

    The Bears have a 10 to 15% chance of beating the Vikes

    And the Bears have 35% to 40% chance of beating the Lions at home

    If they give their all in a losing attempt to beat the Vikes, then the % fall to 20 to 25% to beat the Lions. If they beat the Vikes they fall to 25 to 35% to beat the Lions. Really laying it on the line against the Vikes is wasting valuable ammunition. Throwing good money after bad. It’s strategic stupidity. You come to MN, go through the motions, and live to fight on the day when the odds are more favorable to your squad. The Lions are more vulnerable than the Vikings right now. It’s obvious.If they are smart they will lean into where their chances are best. That is my argument and it is sound.

    Does this logic only work for bad teams or can it work for good teams too? Since the Vikings have 85-90% chance to beat the Bears, if they don’t give it their all and their percentage drops to only 75-80% against the Bears, but increases their odds by giving their all against Seattle next week which will be much closer odds, wouldn’t that be a strategically smart move?

    Matt Moen
    South Minneapolis
    Posts: 4357
    #2304516

    You’re right, Werm. I can only think in 3 dimensions cuz I’m a total rube.

    I’ll defer all future NFL strategy discussions to BP.

Viewing 19 posts - 1 through 19 (of 19 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.