7-10 million more than most teams and it has nothing to do with #20’s contract. Combine that with koivu 5.5 and you have 12-15 million to spend on your top two centers and that is where the wild are weak. Seams to me trading zucker is not the solution to the problem. The resources are not being spent the same as the top teams in the league. Throw in rask 4million and you could sign Backstrom and Kuznetsov.
A really good case made for the fact that the problem with the Wild is what I’ve been saying all along. It’s not Parise and Suter’s contracts or Koivu’s long tenure that has held back the Wild.
It’s the freaking DISASTROUS mismanagement from the GM’s office for basically the whole life of the franchise! If you want 3 reasons why the Wild are in the spot they are not, it’s not Parise, Suter, and Koivu. It’s Fentard, Fletcher, and Risboro. Collectively, I would challenge anyone to come up with any club that has had a consecutive run of 3 GMs that are bigger duds than this trifecta.
We haven’t had the best players, but in the GM office we’ve had even awful, bad, and even worse. Just look at how ONE bad deal can impact the club. The Fentard’s acquisition of Rask will haunt this club for nearly 10 years! That would be the 5 years that we’ll be massively overpaying him plus 5 more years where we are missing the players we COULD have bought and developed while we were stuck with Rask.
As I’ve said before, for a team that’s had a run of 3 of the worst GMs in hockey, it’s actually astonishing the Wild have done as well as they have.
IMO, the ONLY bright spot is that firing Fentard’s useless @ss MAY indicate that Craig finally has figured it out. To rephrase that great George Carville quote, “[It’s] the GM, stupid.”
Grouse