MN DNR News Release: More than 50 invasive carp captured on Mississippi River

  • Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1922629

    More than 50 invasive carp captured on Mississippi River

    The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is conducting an immediate response to the capture of 51 invasive carp on the Mississippi River. The invasive carp were caught by two commercial fishing operators near La Crosse and Trempealeau, Wisconsin, during routine spring netting last weekend.

    In response to this discovery, the DNR is working with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Geological Survey, the Wisconsin DNR and commercial fishing operators to conduct large-scale netting, studies of the captured carp and increased monitoring.

    “This robust response will provide additional information about the population while removing any other invasive carp they happen to catch,” said DNR invasive species unit supervisor Heidi Wolf.

    When the commercial fishing operator operating near La Crosse saw what he thought were invasive carp, he contacted the DNR. The DNR invasive carp field crew assisted in removing and identifying the fish. The DNR identified 39 silver carp and 11 grass carp caught in Pool 8 of the Mississippi, just south of La Crosse, and one silver carp caught in Pool 6, about 20 miles farther upstream. All invasive carp recovered have been given to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to determine their age, size and gender.

    “The location where these fish were caught is commonly netted because of concentrations of commercially valuable fish,” said DNR invasive carp field lead Ben Larson. “This is the largest congregation of invasive carp we’ve seen this far upstream.”

    Invasive carp have been progressing upstream since escaping into the Mississippi River in Arkansas in the 1970s. These large fish compete with native species and pose a threat to rivers and lakes. No breeding populations have been detected in Minnesota waters to date. Individual invasive carp have been caught as far upstream as Pool 2 of the Mississippi, near the Twin Cities (bighead, grass, and silver), the King Power Plant on the St. Croix River by Oak Park Heights (bighead), and just downstream of Granite Falls in the Minnesota River (bighead).

    Previous captures of invasive carp in Minnesota have been individuals or small numbers of fish. This capture indicates an increase in the abundance of invasive carp in the Pool 8 portion of the river between Minnesota and Wisconsin, and is very likely related to the prolonged high water conditions on the Mississippi River during the summer of 2019. During high water, gates at the locks and dams on the river are kept open to pass flood waters. These “open river” conditions allow easier upstream movement of fish from downstream portions of the river, where invasive carp densities are higher.

    The DNR has built partnerships with state and federal agencies, conservation groups, university researchers and commercial businesses to prevent the spread of invasive carp. The 2015 closure of the Mississippi River lock at Upper St. Anthony Falls in Minneapolis was a major accomplishment of these efforts.

    The DNR is actively engaged with several prevention efforts:

    The DNR is an active partner in the Upper Mississippi River Invasive Carp Workgroup. The group includes representatives from Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, Missouri, and several federal agencies.
    In partnership with the DNR, the Minnesota Aquatic Invasive Species Research Center (MAISRC) at the University of Minnesota is testing and evaluating carp deterrents in Mississippi River locks and dams. Previously, MAISRC installed and evaluated a speaker system at Lock 8. Development of this technology will continue this year with the installation of an updated speaker system at this location.
    The DNR’s Fish and Wildlife Division leads a program to monitor fish population changes and impacts of management actions. This includes maintaining important relationships with commercial fishing operators, as demonstrated in this instance.
    State funding sources, including the Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund and Outdoor Heritage Fund, have provided key funding for deterrent actions and the DNR invasive carp detection and response program.

    Invasive carp captures must be reported to the DNR immediately. Call 651-587-2781 or email [email protected]. Take a photo and transport the carp to the nearest DNR fisheries office or make arrangements for it to be picked up by a DNR official.

    More information about invasive carp is available on the DNR website.

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1922635

    I wonder how much last years high water played into this?

    Guess it really doesn’t matter.

    PS Silver carp are the “great flying carp” (and are excellent smoked with the exception of all the bones).

    Ahren Wagner
    Northern ND-MN
    Posts: 410
    #1922641

    If people can almost eradicate Bison from the great plains and wipe out the passenger pigeon, I don’t see why we can’t do the same with Asian carp.

    sji
    Posts: 421
    #1922647

    Bison will have one maybe two calfs a year. Asian carp can lay millions of eggs in a year. Going to be a battle.

    Walleyestudent Andy Cox
    Garrison MN-Mille Lacs
    Posts: 4484
    #1922650

    “The location where these fish were caught is commonly netted because of concentrations of commercially valuable fish,” said DNR invasive carp field lead Ben Larson.

    BK, do you know what the “commercially valuable fish” they net for are?

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1922658

    Buffalo is the biggest by far.
    Carp is number 2

    In much lower numbers they sell
    Channel Cat
    Flathead
    Gar
    Eel

    I’m going off of memory from 7+ years ago, there might be more and I know they were working on taking both cats off the commercial harvest list. Not sure if that’s happened yet.

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1922672

    This is from 2013

      MINNESOTA

    Licensed Commercial Fishing…the latest info I have in my possession.

    Eleven commercial fishing licences were issued in 201 3 (Table 1), of which only five license holders actively fished (3 for commercial sale and 2 for personal use).

    Total harvest reported in 2013 was 527,294 pounds (Table 3) , and is below the 39- year mean of 684,000 pounds
    harvested (Figure 1) .

    The total estimated value of the 2013 commercial harvest was $ 148,850

    (Table 2). Eight species of fish were commercially sold and the percent composition of the catch
    included: buffalo (largemouth and smallmouth combined) – 46%,
    freshwater drum – 23%,
    common carp – 20%,
    carpsuckers (predominantly quillback) – 11%
    catfish (flathead and channel combined), redhorse species and gar – < 1% combined (Table 3).

    Average price paid per pound (whole fish), reported by fishermen, w as similar to prices received in recent years: $0.10 -$0.20/lb for common carp, freshwater drum and carpsucker species, $0.35/lb for channel catfish and $0.45/lb for flathead catfish.

    The reported price paid per pound for bigmouth and smallmouth
    buffalo, however, varied considerably from $0.25/lb to $0.65/lb, due to the different price paid for each species (generally less for smallmouth buffalo) and whether they were sold in the live market or dead market (more for the live market).

    buckybadger
    Upper Midwest
    Posts: 8175
    #1922724

    This is beyond bad news.

    Many armchair biologists always thought the cold waters and long winters would keep the invasive carp from ever establishing a population this far north. With this news release, I’m jumping off that bandwagon for sure. If a commercial operation netting a tiny fraction of the pool found that many, it’s tough to imagine they are not here and reproducing. Pool 4 is so unique compared to other pools with its sheer size and wide range of water temperatures that they could likely find a way to establish a population.

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1922728

    I was thinking the same thing BB. Then I remembered they need something like 14 miles of river with a slack water area at the end of it. Something like a bay to develop in.

    As I’m one of those Armchair Biologist, I am surprised they found that many, that far North. As of today, I’m resting on the extremely high water that allowed more to migrate upstream.

    shockers
    Rochester
    Posts: 1040
    #1922778

    Invasive carp, coronavirus….our pets’ heads fallin off!!

    Walleyestudent Andy Cox
    Garrison MN-Mille Lacs
    Posts: 4484
    #1922786

    $0.35/lb for channel catfish and $0.45/lb for flathead catfish.

    This must’ve been quite the insult for a catfishing guide… sad

    Otherwise yes, I figured the commercial harvest was primarily buffalo and other rough species. I guess maybe more what I was wondering is what/where the market is for those fishes?

    I suppose I could just “google” it. smirk

    BoatsHateMe
    Between Pool 2 and Pool 4
    Posts: 782
    #1922864

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Brian Klawitter wrote:</div>
    $0.35/lb for channel <em class=”ido-tag-em”>catfish and $0.45/lb for flathead catfish.

    This must’ve been quite the insult for a catfishing guide… sad

    Otherwise yes, I figured the commercial harvest was primarily buffalo and other rough species. I guess maybe more what I was wondering is what/where the market is for those fishes?

    I suppose I could just “google” it. smirk

    Take a walk through one of the local Asian markets. I’ve often been suspect of my beloved Filet-O-Fishes origins.

    targaman
    Inactive
    Wilton, WI
    Posts: 2759
    #1922955

    This will be the cure for Coronavirus. A godsend.

    buckybadger
    Upper Midwest
    Posts: 8175
    #1922965

    This reporter blames it on climate change. (paragraph 10)

    http://www.startribune.com/record-51-asian-carp-caught-in-minnesota-a-sign-the-fish-may-have-established-permanent-populations/568775572/

    There’s no one thing to blame. However, there’s no denying the substantial changes on the river over the last decade. Sedimentation, higher average water temps, flood stage levels for 8 months last year, now the carp moving further up river.

    Is the climate playing into this? I’m not sure. To say there’s not changes though is just living with your head in the sand. This last summer had more water in the system than I can remember in over 30 years around here.

    The carp aren’t some hoax, panic attempt, or anything comparable. It’s too bad this information came out simultaneously with the Coronavirus stuff as people are going to instantly group them together as something that likely “will go away”. Once people realize what these fish have done downriver they will realize how devastating they are. Let’s hope they have not established a resident population this far north.

    Eelpoutguy
    Farmington, Outing
    Posts: 10430
    #1922984

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>eelpoutguy wrote:</div>
    This reporter blames it on climate change. (paragraph 10)

    http://www.startribune.com/record-51-asian-carp-caught-in-minnesota-a-sign-the-fish-may-have-established-permanent-populations/568775572/

    I don’t see that the reporter is blaming climate change, he is quoting The U of M researcher.

    Yes, you are correct I mistated. It was a U of M researcher.

    I was comparing the 2 articles and the DNR report didn’t mention the “climate change” causing for high water.
    Sorenson states in the paragraph above that “that part of the river floods frequently” then he goes on to say “with more frequent flooding brought on by climate change”

    Come on, give me a break.

    river rat randy
    Hager City WI
    Posts: 1736
    #1923155

    This will be the cure for Coronavirus. A godsend.

    A Godsend.? Witch One.? The Virus or the Carp or Both.??

Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.