MN DNR believes

  • BrianF
    Posts: 787
    #1616092

    Many MN anglers suffer from The Stockholm Syndrome, the psychological phenomenon that occurs when held captive so long that the hostage begins to bond with the warped ideology of their captors.

    MN resort owners aren’t capable of planning to meet the needs of anglers outside of the traditional walleye opener? Seriously? The DNR won’t even entertain a catch and release only, continuous bass season with artificial lures only because why? We bassers see might accidentally catch large numbers of walleye that we would also have to release immediately? Sorry, incidental catches of walleye don’t happen often to us bassers and when on the rare occassion that one is caught, there is little to no mortality to those immediately released walleyes. Just as there is little to no mortality to immediately released bass.

    Heck, even the closed-season supporter MikeW will be quick to point to the excellent walleye fishing available on Pool 2 of the Mississippi, which is a continuous season, though catch and release only section of the river. Catch and release and other management regs besides a season closure work – and work well.

    If you really want to protect walleye populations, the DNRs own research, backed by many others, should point to the closure of our lakes and rivers to livebait fishing in the warm water period of mid-summer and beyond a certain depth. That, and overly generous possession limits, is where lots of walleye mortality is occurring by non-tribal anglers. Close the season or change the regs when it counts most – the high mortality warm water period of the summer months – if you really care about the walleye fishery. Don’t make up some cockamamie story about how catch and release bass fishing is a threat to the walleye fishery.

    Yes, the system is broken and broken in so many ways, primarily due to non-biology, non-science based regs that are determined more by political whims and traditions than any thing else.

    basseyes
    Posts: 2569
    #1616177

    ^
    ^
    ^
    X2!

    Well stated and spot on factual!

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59996
    #1616188

    Yes, the system is broken and broken in so many ways, primarily due to non-biology, non-science based regs that are determined more by political whims and traditions than any thing else.

    political whims.

    I think that might be too narrow of a description.

    Bass Pundit
    8m S. of Platte/Sullivan Lakes, Minnesocold
    Posts: 1870
    #1616323

    A couple points on my original post to start this thread.
    Get out there: Fishing already open for many species

    This is the April 25th Press Release I quoted from.

    I wasn’t able to quite articulate the OP they way I wanted too. The danger to walleye I was trying to speak of the DNR being so wary of was strictly related to MN fishermen catching incidental walleye during the closed season versus the damage that pike are doing 24/7 everyday. Not every fishery in the state is adversely effected by having an over abundance of hammer handle pike and the proposed new regulations which I support are a good step in my opinion for dealing with the problem.

    The state needs lesser numbers of pike with a bigger average size. I strongly believe Pike not having a closed season at all would also help with reaching that aim. I think people intentionally trying to catch walleye in the guise of fishing for pike would be a minuscule problem. People fishing for walleye in the guise of fishing for perch and panfish apparently isn’t viewed as a problem, why would pike fishing be any different?

Viewing 4 posts - 31 through 34 (of 34 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.