Looking at this strictly in marketing and PR terms and there is no question in my mind that if you want to promote the outdoors-related tourism in any area, hosting this event is a goldmine.
Just look at the VOLUME of coverage the area gets. Every news outlet, be it TV, web, radio, newspaper, etc in MN carried coverage of the event and they do so every year. And without exception, they all mention WHERE the event is being held in every report. So Alexandria gets mentioned over, and over, and over, and over… Hmmmm. Tough to see a downside to that if you want visibility of your area as a fishing destination. Basically, you get wall-to-wall media blitz for 4 days.
Catching fish/not catching fish, this species, that. Nobody remembers and nobody cares. If the governor doesn’t catch, it’s the guide’s fault anyway . Hopefully, you know of a decent guide in the area.
Of course it’s a lot of work, but any/every event that get’s that kind of visibility is going to be a ton of work and it’s going to require a big budget and lots of time.
From a strategy perspective, I’d be looking at the key strategic goals Alexandria wants to drive through hosting. “Getting on the map” was really St. Cloud’s angle this year. IMO, Alex is “on the map”, but is it seen as a grade A fishing destination?
Grouse