Mille Lacs New Walleye Regs

  • Bass Pundit
    8m S. of Platte/Sullivan Lakes, Minnesocold
    Posts: 2030
    #2323598

    Minnesota DNR sets open water fishing regulations for walleye on Mille Lacs Lake
    Anglers on Mille Lacs Lake will have the opportunity to harvest two walleye daily during the upcoming open water season, which begins on Saturday, May 10, and continues through Sunday, Nov. 30. Harvested walleye must be 17 inches or greater, and only one of them can be over 20 inches.

    Following years of restrictive regulations, the Mille Lacs Lake walleye (ogaa in Ojibwe) fishery appears to be in a healthy state, a viewpoint shared by both state and Tribal fisheries biologists.

    The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and Ojibwe treaty Tribes drastically cut harvest more than a decade ago, concerned by a number of factors including changing ecological conditions and lower survival rates of young walleye. This approach has paid off.

    “The walleye population in Mille Lacs is currently in a good place,” said Brad Parsons, Minnesota DNR fisheries section manager. “Ojibwe Tribes and the Minnesota DNR limited harvest, which allowed for an increased number of adult spawning walleye, and a strong 2024 year class that bodes well for the future health of the fishery.”

    There also is an abundance of forage in the lake due to strong yellow perch and cisco 2024 year classes that are keeping walleye in a healthy condition. Higher availability of forage can reduce the risk of excessive angler catch rates.

    State-licensed anglers share the harvest on Mille Lacs Lake with Ojibwe Tribes that have reserved rights to fish, wildlife and other natural resources under an 1837 Treaty. Ojibwe treaty Tribes — including Mille Lacs Band and Fond du Lac Band — established the Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission in 1984 to help oversee off-reservation resource protection, enhancement and harvest seasons in a three-state region.

    “Our commitment to ongoing research, science and using all available evidence to inform Mille Lacs Lake stewardship has benefitted everyone,” said Alexandra Bohman, GLIFWC director of biological services. “Interagency resource management works.”

    To conserve the fishery, an annual harvest level is set through discussion and agreement between the state of Minnesota and treaty Tribes. Each party manages its own share of the harvest. This year’s agreement considered various factors, including the lake’s increased adult walleye population, and resulted in a safe harvest limit of 113,600 pounds for state-licensed anglers and 88,000 pounds for Ojibwe treaty fishers.

    “We are pleased that anglers will have an increased harvest opportunity this season,” Parsons said. “Mille Lacs Lake continues to surprise us, making it hard to assume conditions will be the same from year to year. We appreciate coming to an agreement with the Tribes that allows some additional flexibility for the state to manage its fishery through these changes. This includes the ability, in the event we exceed the state share of harvest, to allow catch and release walleye angling as long as the state share of harvest is not exceeded by 15%. Any amount above the state share of harvest would be deducted from state harvest next year.”

    People who fish are reminded to protect Mille Lacs Lake and all Minnesota waters from aquatic invasive species by cleaning and draining watercraft and equipment and disposing of unwanted bait in the trash. A decontamination station is available 24 hours, seven days a week at the Shaw-Bosh-Kung Bay public access on the west side of Mille Lacs Lake about 8 miles south of Garrison on U.S. Highway 169.

    Mille Lacs Lake continues to experience changes in part because of invasive species such as zebra mussels and spiny water fleas. State and Tribal biologists collaboratively study the lake’s complex food web and other developments such as the recent increase in large yellow perch (asaawe in Ojibwe). Additional information about aquatic invasive species and Minnesota’s prevention efforts is available on the Minnesota DNR website (mndnr.gov/invasives/ais/index.html).

    Also of note, on March 11, the daily and possession limit for yellow perch on Mille Lacs Lake was reduced from 20 to five, a regulation that will be in place through Nov. 30. Complete Mille Lacs Lake fishing regulations and regularly updated surveys that show ongoing state-licensed angler catches of walleye, northern pike and yellow perch are available on the Minnesota DNR website (mndnr.gov/millelacslake).

    fishthumper
    Sartell, MN.
    Posts: 12831
    #2323600

    After the slaughter on the perch this last winter, Saw the perch change happening.
    I guess being able to keep 2 walleyes is better than one. Not sure this will change anyone’s mind to head there or not

    CaptainMusky
    Posts: 25251
    #2323605

    I actually like the 2 fish over 17 and only 1 can be over 20. Seems reasonable to me at first glance anyway.

    Bass Pundit
    8m S. of Platte/Sullivan Lakes, Minnesocold
    Posts: 2030
    #2323607

    I’m good as long as they don’t close it down in the Fall. I don’t know why the harvest numbers for the quota were omitted from the press release.

    CaptainMusky
    Posts: 25251
    #2323608

    I’m good as long as they don’t close it down in the Fall.

    Agreed. I know it was mentioned early that perhaps 3 fish, but that would probably put us in jeopardy of hitting quota and causing the shutdown.

    Ripjiggen
    Posts: 13234
    #2323624

    I’m good as long as they don’t close it down in the Fall. I don’t know why the harvest numbers for the quota were omitted from the press release.

    Are they not right in this paragraph?

    To conserve the fishery, an annual harvest level is set through discussion and agreement between the state of Minnesota and treaty Tribes. Each party manages its own share of the harvest. This year’s agreement considered various factors, including the lake’s increased adult walleye population, and resulted in a safe harvest limit of 113,600 pounds for state-licensed anglers and 88,000 pounds for Ojibwe treaty fishers.

    Jason
    Posts: 904
    #2323626

    It will be shut down mid summer with the #’s presented in my mind. The one over 20″ should be an fairly easy fish for people to catch.

    bigcrappie
    Blaine
    Posts: 4597
    #2323641

    Yep they will call that they hit the quota the weekend after opener and close it down for the rest of the summer.

    Ripjiggen
    Posts: 13234
    #2323645

    Yep they will call that they hit the quota the weekend after opener and close it down for the rest of the summer.

    Yeah I doubt that.
    Sure there might be a shut down to catch and release at some point. There should be zero reason to shut down walleye fishing ever.

    Would rather have a chance to hit the quota vs never hitting it like the last several years.

    John Rasmussen
    Blaine
    Posts: 6913
    #2323648

    Would rather have a chance to hit the quota vs never hitting it like the last several years.

    Bingo. While I’m not jumping up and down about this, I will still take it.

    lindyrig79
    Forest Lake / Lake Mille Lacs
    Posts: 6493
    #2323669

    Good news to me waytogo

    OG Net_Man
    Posts: 913
    #2323672

    This is more generous of a limit than I had expected. The powers at be must expect a slow bite due to forage.

    gim
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 19236
    #2323694

    This is more generous of a limit than I had expected. The powers at be must expect a slow bite due to forage.

    I thought it would be 2 fish, but I didn’t see the part about allowing harvest of a bigger fish coming. Can’t wait to keep a 26 inch walleye. smash

    Ripjiggen
    Posts: 13234
    #2323708

    Go for it. I keep all my 55 inch muskies. Lots of meat.

    Jason
    Posts: 904
    #2323709

    The 22-27″ fish are sadly going to be very yummy for most boats.

    gim
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 19236
    #2323716

    I was joking. Calm down.

    gim
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 19236
    #2323718

    I was referencing Jason’s post.

    But ok then

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1071
    #2323739

    Here’s what I wish was easier articulate and more widely distributed:
    The tribe’s contribution to this plan cannot be understated.
    Of course I’m biased, but I would go as far as to say that the tribes wrote this plan that is obviously beneficial to the state. The tribes proposed the specifics of this plan.

    The state was having so many regulation problems and the tribes have a vested interest in the Mille Lacs fishery running smoothly. We came up with a solution

    The state should really quit putting any money in to the lake other than musky stocking. The state has no control, it’s all up to the tribes and this post just reinforces that. It’d be interesting to know how many millions of our state tax dollars go in to this lake. And for what? The tribe controls it. What a waste of dnr funds this lake is.

    I could see a potential for the lake to have more liberal regs if the state was just honest with all of us and admitted they don’t really have much of a say and said the tribe is going to set the rules. Then it’s all on the tribes, which it is now anyways, but maybe they’d decide to be more generous when the blame is on them. And maybe, just maybe, more people would stop supporting the casino when they are upset with the regulations. I wouldn’t hold my breath on that one though.

    I’m not upset with the rules and don’t blame the health of the lake fish populations on the tribes or netting. I’ve made that clear in the past. Personally I don’t think the lake ever had a problem. Some of the best fishing I have had out there was during the ‘crash’. Lake was nice and quiet and we were a slayin. I’d just like to see some honesty with the situation.

    I got a kick out of them patting themselves on the back for the tight regs leading to the current situation. The forage is the reason the lake is what it is right now. Humans like to think we are in control of everything. Did we create the perch and tulibee boom that led to the great survival of yoy walleyes?

    When I saw the new perch regs all I could do was laugh. The never ending drama that is Mille lacs lake.

    People best stop posting pictures of tullibee piles on social media. Next up is a closed tulibee season or restricted limit…on a minnow! lol lol

    CaptainMusky
    Posts: 25251
    #2323781

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Ripjiggen wrote:</div>
    Go for it. I keep all my 55 inch muskies. Lots of meat.

    How many of them have you caught?

    Probably around the same number of sasquatches he has seen.

    gim
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 19236
    #2323827

    0:27 may be relevant here. rotflol

    JEREMY
    BP
    Posts: 4600
    #2323830

    Them muskie cheeks and wings are good eatin.

    Ripjiggen
    Posts: 13234
    #2323831

    Usually a 2-3 a year. Anymore than that I would have to get another chest freezer.

    BigWerm
    SW Metro
    Posts: 12829
    #2323843

    The state should really quit putting any money in to the lake other than musky stocking.

    Well the state doesn’t really stock it, so the only funds going to ML are in studying the lake (creel, fisheries mgmt etc.) and the little bit of enforcement they do there.

    It’s pretty clear to me they are managing to maximize tribal take, and minimize any other races take.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1071
    #2323854

    Usually a 2-3 a year. Anymore than that I would have to get another chest freezer.

    Man you are a pro. The best musky fisherman would be jealous of anyone who can catch two 55’s a year. What is your secret technique? It appears you want to kill all of them so surely you’ll share.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1071
    #2323855

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>FinnyDinDin wrote:</div>
    The state should really quit putting any money in to the lake other than musky stocking.

    Well the state doesn’t really stock it, so the only funds going to ML are in studying the lake (creel, fisheries mgmt etc.) and the little bit of enforcement they do there.

    It’s pretty clear to me they are managing to maximize tribal take, and minimize any other races take.

    When did they stop stocking Muskies in Mille lacs?

    The creel, fishery management, etc is the waste I am talking about. What is the point? It doesn’t seem like that has any effect on what the tribes allow us to take.

    CaptainMusky
    Posts: 25251
    #2323856

    Man you are a pro. The best musky fisherman would be jealous of anyone who can catch two 55’s a year. What is your secret technique? It appears you want to kill all of them so surely you’ll share.

    obviously it’s forward facing sonar.

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 1071
    #2323858

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>FinnyDinDin wrote:</div>
    Man you are a pro. The best musky fisherman would be jealous of anyone who can catch two 55’s a year. What is your secret technique? It appears you want to kill all of them so surely you’ll share.

    obviously it’s forward facing sonar.

    Ripjiggin doesn’t seem smart enough to be able to utilize that technology proper.

    BigWerm
    SW Metro
    Posts: 12829
    #2323860

    When did they stop stocking Muskies in Mille lacs?

    The creel, fishery management, etc is the waste I am talking about. What is the point? It doesn’t seem like that has any effect on what the tribes allow us to take.

    They didn’t stop they stock musky every other year, I thought you were saying they should stop stocking it with anything besides musky. Which other than that brief period of walleye stocking in 2016-2018 they have never really stocked with anything besides musky.
    https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/lakefind/showstocking.html?context=desktop&downum=48000200

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 65 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.