I’ve noticed an interesting split in approaches that is emerging with deer hunters and hunting property managers and I’d love to hear some discussion about which way IDO members are trending.
For years now it seems the predominate approach (or at least the one that got the most coverage/attention) was the “Ultra-low Pressure” approach. Obviously, there are significant differences in how different hunters and property managers used this approach, but the gist of it was to take great pains to avoid any and all movement or presence on the hunting property that wasn’t absolutely necessary.
And when the hunter or manager HAD to be on the property, extreme measures were taken to avoid leaving any scent or making any unnecessary disturbance. Rubber boots, de-scented sprays and clothing, silent clothing, gloves, even breathing masks were used to conceal scent and mask noise.
Within the last couple of years, I notice that another approach has gained more followers and gotten more coverage. I’m calling this the Human Presence Conditioning approach.
With this approach, the concept is to get the deer on a property used to a certain level of human presence. You want to condition the deer to believe that humans are noisy, smelly, and predictable. The idea is for the deer to learn (or believe they have learned) that when humans are present, they will get plenty of “warning” by hearing and smelling us and then when we’re not making any noise or laying down scent, it’s because we’re not there and therefore there is no danger.
One of the more common uses of the Human Presence Conditioning approach is always using an ATV or a vehicle to get dropped off at a deer stand or to move around the property. Yes, the deer both hear and smell this vehicle approach and the scent it leaves, but if they are conditioned in advance to the presence of vehicles, they believe that vehicle gone = human gone. Even if scent remains.
This approach has been ramped up in other areas of property management, the idea being that being present on a property and having the deer know it is actually a good thing. The only bad thing is that you never want to have a surprise encounter with a deer. You want every deer to believe that people are “those smelly, noisy things” that are easy to avoid and don’t represent any real danger because humans are so noisy we couldn’t sneak up on a freight train.
I’m not presenting this as “there’s a right and wrong approach”. I’m sure it’s highly situational, but I’m wondering if others have noticed these seemingly divergent trends?
Personally, I’m believing more and more in the Human Presence Conditioning approach.
I was trying my best to follow as much of the Ultra-low Pressure approach in past years, but for several reasons I was starting to question whether this approach was really right for a small, intensively managed hunting property like mine (80 acres) in an area where hunting pressure is high. It basically felt like I was trying to have it both ways.
So now I’m thinking more and more about the conditioning approach and how to both develop the property and the methods around that approach. For example, I want to expand all my trails so that I only check cameras by driving the ATV to them.
And I’m also trying to start any visit or work I do on my property by driving the ATV and making noise to alert the deer to my presence. I actually want to push them away and eliminate “chance” encounters as much as possible
Have others noticed this divergence in approaches and what are you trying to do on your property?
Grouse