Looks like Chiefs and Niner's

  • Beast
    Posts: 1123
    #1907735

    Can we use the MN #1 excuse “the refs screwed us” yet?

    B-man
    Posts: 5797
    #1907736

    It’s 99% done…..but a couple turnovers could turn things around quick.

    Anybody watch the first quarter of the Chiefs and Texans ?

    A couple “miracles” could happen lol

    Probably not…. but we need it )

    The 9er’s are getting flashy and smiley….a turnover is coming (probably another Packer one though) (

    JEREMY
    BP
    Posts: 3894
    #1907737

    I’m vikes all the way and was hoping for a packers loss but was wishing for more of a heartbreaker like 31-30. Guess it can still happen. Oh maybe not now. 33-7

    crappie55369
    Mound, MN
    Posts: 5757
    #1907738

    Can we use the MN #1 excuse “the refs screwed us” yet?

    Take your pick of excuses. Won’t erase this pathetic performance.

    belletaine
    Nevis, MN
    Posts: 5116
    #1907743

    It’s 99% done…..but a couple turnovers could turn things around quick.

    Anybody watch the first quarter of the Chiefs and Texans ?

    A couple “miracles” could happen lol

    Probably not…. but we need it )

    The 9er’s are getting flashy and smiley….a turnover is coming (probably another Packer one though) (

    stranger things have happened!
    I’m a Vikes fan and love the rivalry. Never any malice, just fun ribbing!

    GO NINER’S!!

    munchy
    NULL
    Posts: 4931
    #1907747

    devil

    Attachments:
    1. gallery_xlarge.jpg

    ClownColor
    Inactive
    The Back 40
    Posts: 1955
    #1907753

    My paper boy finally showed up.

    Are you “pulling my leg?”

    B-man
    Posts: 5797
    #1907765

    Holy Carp, if the D can hold up and get a turnover the Pack is right back in it!!

    The clock is their only enemy now

    B-man
    Posts: 5797
    #1907777

    Should’ve been against the Vikings, but they could only score 10 against the 9er’s….They can’t even win when I want them to )

    ClownColor
    Inactive
    The Back 40
    Posts: 1955
    #1907780

    Na na…

    munchy
    NULL
    Posts: 4931
    #1907784

    Good night!

    jeff_huberty
    Inactive
    Posts: 4941
    #1907944

    Can we use the MN #1 excuse “the refs screwed us” yet?

    Absolutely waytogo

    They should have thrown a flag on the 49ers offense, for unnecessary roughness on the Packers Defense.

    coffee

    walleyebuster5
    Central MN
    Posts: 3916
    #1907955

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>James Bystrom wrote:</div>
    Can we use the MN #1 excuse “the refs screwed us” yet?

    Absolutely waytogo

    They should have thrown a flag on the 49ers offense, for unnecessary roughness on the Packers Defense.

    coffee

    applause applause applause

    philtickelson
    Inactive
    Mahtomedi, MN
    Posts: 1678
    #1907960

    I think the worst thing about the Niners killing the Vikes and the Pack in the way that they did is that it’s just going to give Zimmer more ammo for the ‘we need to run the ball 1st’ offensive philosophy.

    Which like completely ignores the fact that our offensive line is not up to that task at all, as we run the ball for 0 yards against any team with a strong D line.

    Or that our defense isn’t up to the task anymore either.

    Dutchboy
    Central Mn.
    Posts: 16650
    #1907963

    Yes they can’t run the ball. If you ignore the results of the first 12 games.

    philtickelson
    Inactive
    Mahtomedi, MN
    Posts: 1678
    #1908044

    Yes they can’t run the ball. If you ignore the results of the first 12 games.

    Vikes beat Broncos: 36 yards rushing by our RBs.
    Vikes lose to bears 16-6: Cook = 40 yards rushing
    Vikes lose to Chiefs 23-26: Cook = 71 yards rushing against a ‘poor’ run defense
    Vikes lose to Seahawks 30-37: Cook = 29 yards rushing, Mattison = 22.
    Vikes lose to Packers 23-10: 55 yards between Abdullah/Boone.
    Vikes lose to Niners: 21 yards rushing.

    Big games against big opponents we couldn’t move the ball on the ground. It’s great that we can run over the Lions/Raiders/Giants/Redskins/Falcons/Chargers with our run game, but if doesn’t translate for us in the big games for some reason.

    That’s as deep as I’m gonna go, but if it doesn’t work against ‘good’ teams, then that’s kind of a problem when we get to the playoffs. Sure, we ran well against NO, but do we run consistently enough to win 3 playoff games against the best teams? Doesn’t look like it.

    mnrabbit
    South Central Minnesota
    Posts: 815
    #1908276

    Big time Vikings fan… Not sure who I’ll cheer for. Have always kind of liked the Chiefs as my AFC/Non-Vikings team (Midwest, cool outdoor stadium with grass and great fan support, also not traditionally great so can’t bandwagon them either) but the Niners have my favorite non-Viking player in the league in George Kittle.

    Like Joe Montana recently posted, he’s guaranteeing his team will win.
    https://twitter.com/JoeMontana/status/1219345360293896195

    belletaine
    Nevis, MN
    Posts: 5116
    #1908484

    Phil, which was the most impressive win, Pack at Home after a bye vs Seattle or Vikes AT New Orleans in the Wildcard?

    The Vikings started the 2nd quarter of the season passing more. Couldn’t it be said that set up the run? Chicken & egg, to a point. The run just doesn’t work all the time.

    Coaching…
    New OC & DC next year. Can’t wait cause they’re not getting any younger.

    mnrabbit
    South Central Minnesota
    Posts: 815
    #1908672

    Phil, which was the most impressive win, Pack at Home after a bye vs Seattle or Vikes AT New Orleans in the Wildcard?

    No matter the teams, regular season, or post season, a road win (specifically in the playoffs) will always be a more impressive and difficult win than a home win.

Viewing 22 posts - 31 through 52 (of 52 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.