<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>arcticm1000 wrote:</div>
I got down to the St Croix to do some trolling for a couple of hours this afternoon. Tried some tail dancers off of boards, a jointed shad rap off lead core, and a couple of jointed shads with 8 oz snap weights. This is the first time I have used snap weights. They caught all the fish. They were easy to work with. 50′ snap weight and then another 30 to 50′ depending on depth. Quick and easy to raise or drop with the depth. I will definitely be using them in the future.Thanks to everyone for posting all the great info in this thread.
We troll 8 oz. snap weights on inside lines and leadcore on outside lines on lakes where my wife and I can troll with multiple lines. It works very well with one method outfishing the other on certain days but usually, both methods catch fish equally as well. More often than not, it seems like it’s just a matter of getting the right depth dialed in on one method or the other to get the fish biting on all of them.
I’ve read articles stating that slight differences in the up and down movement of crankbaits using leadcore vs. snapweights when changing speeds can make a difference at times also. It makes some sense to me that one may trigger fish more than the other at certain times because of it.
Snap weights do have the advantage over leadcore of being able to quickly get a lure in the water and down to depth where leadcore takes time to do so. It’s also a lot quicker to check a lure to see if it’s running properly or change crankbaits fishing with snap weights than doing the same fishing with leadcore.
Good points. I have read similar articles. I could defiantly see one producing better one day and the other producing better another day. It was my first time trying snap weights and I was really impressed with how easy they were to adjust and deploy.