Interesting Study

B-Man also though this craziness was going to be over in 2 weeks about 4 weeks ago. Forgive me if I don’t follow his scientific advice.

The infection rate is much higher than reported just for the simple fact you can’t get a test unless you are already almost dead or a celebrity, it does look like there are flaws with this study…

“The study quickly drew criticism from experts.

It used Facebook ads to seek volunteers, who experts said may be more likely to have interest in such a test because they had symptoms, compared with a random sample of the population”

antibody testing

There is significant sampling bias due to the self-selection and non-random nature of the participants.

The Stanford research site isn’t hyping the study. I cannot even find it on their site.

Peer reviews are rejecting the study. Here’s an example:
https://medium.com/@balajis/peer-review-of-covid-19-antibody-seroprevalence-in-santa-clara-county-california-1f6382258c25