Flasher or camera?

  • QC1
    Posts: 22
    #1302535

    I have an FL-8SE that I wouldn’t be without on the ice. I am considering buying either another flasher for my boys to use or going with a camera. I’m wondering if they’d get a bigger kick out of the camera vs. a flasher. How useful are they for ice fishing? I’m going to guess they are a bigger hassle to set up and move, but I’ve never used one.

    ottomatica
    Lino Lakes, MN
    Posts: 1380
    #944730

    Kids LOVE the camera…

    Jake_A
    Posts: 569
    #944732

    Definitely go with the camera. On days when it is hard to detect bites or find the size/species you are marking, it is invaluable. Kids love them too

    mnwalleyeangler
    Posts: 196
    #944734

    just make sure on the body of water you fish most is on the clearer side because they wont work on some lakes.. lotw for example

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #944735

    If it was an addition for you, I would say camera of course.

    Since your talking about other fisherpeople without a flasher, a flasher will put more fish on the ice in all conditions.

    Entertainment value-100% camera.

    There are times especially this time of year when the bite of panfish is so light the only way to catch them is to have a camera on them. No spring bobber is as sensitive as watching the bait get sucked in and spit out than a camera.

    But always a flasher first, camera second.

    Set up on the ice is minimal using one of the new Marcum cameras with on screen depth and the Marcum camera Panner.

    beave
    MPLS
    Posts: 163
    #944763

    Quote:


    If it was an addition for you, I would say camera of course.

    Since your talking about other fisherpeople without a flasher, a flasher will put more fish on the ice in all conditions.

    Entertainment value-100% camera.

    There are times especially this time of year when the bite of panfish is so light the only way to catch them is to have a camera on them. No spring bobber is as sensitive as watching the bait get sucked in and spit out than a camera.

    But always a flasher first, camera second.

    Set up on the ice is minimal using one of the new Marcum cameras with on screen depth and the Marcum camera Panner.


    X2
    If you’re looking for fish, you need a flasher. But once you find them, you want a camera. Can’t tell you how many times the camera has put fish on the ice for me. Last time out, the Eyes were coming through and looking but no takers, by watching their reaction to my presentation, I found out they wanted the jig & minnow on the bottom – with the minnow in a “distressed” state, wiggling around…I could not get them to hit any other way

    cshunt1
    Eagan, MN
    Posts: 370
    #944783

    Quote:


    a flasher will put more fish on the ice in all conditions


    until cameras allow you to watch your bait at any depth and at any time of day, you need a flasher first.

    would you want just side imaging before gps/sonar? no, but side imaging sure is fun to have!

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #944797

    Quote:


    would you want just side imaging before gps/sonar? no, but side imaging sure is fun to have!


    Very good way to put it.

    Then again, if it’s entertainment your looking for only….

    cat dude
    Arlington, MN
    Posts: 1389
    #944823

    Yes, the camera would be entertaining but I would go with a flasher as mentioned it will work in every lake and depth.

    They kids sure do like the camera though.

    I remember the first time I took a camera with, I watched and laughed at the crappies so much as they would inhale and exhale so fast, I forgot to set the hook.

    Bob Bowman
    MN
    Posts: 3544
    #944827

    Quote:


    Quote:



    Very good way to put it.

    Then again, if it’s entertainment your looking for only….


    Then bring Kooty

    My vote would be for the flasher

    rrouff
    Aledo IL
    Posts: 114
    #944924

    I traded a second flasher I picked up at a good price for a camera. I have since sold the camera and am looking at a second flasher again. I fish with an 8 and 10 yo. I thought they would like the camera but they like the flasher better. The ponds we fish are not the clearest water. The kids caught right on to the flasher.

    Just my thoughts

    Jeff

    matt-p
    White Bear Lake, MN
    Posts: 643
    #945147

    I would say flasher.. Works better at anytime of day or conditions such as stained water.

    fishhead50111
    Central Iowa
    Posts: 57
    #950134

    I use the flasher 1st, find what’s moving below, but then I like to see why, after marking fish, what else may be lurking down below affecting the bite.

    travp
    Blaine , Mn
    Posts: 401
    #950160

    Upgrade your flasher and give the kids the old one.

    jsfishin
    Urbana, IA
    Posts: 120
    #951298

    Quote:


    Upgrade your flasher and give the kids the old one.


    Good suggestion. My son and I have a camera, but a second flasher will be in the budget for this fall. Just overall a better tool to use for CATCHING FISH. We do enjoy looking to see them hit, or what kind of fish are there…but effective catching came from the flashers.

    fishingcanada
    Posts: 36
    #952819

    Definitely get the flasher first. The camera is only beneficial when the water clarity is somewhat clear and it isn’t dark out. The flasher will work in all conditions. Don’t get me wrong, the camera can come in quite handy every now and then. But I rely on my flasher far more than I would a camera….any day.

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #952898

    Quote:


    The camera is only beneficial when the water clarity is somewhat clear and it isn’t dark out.


    Mr. Canada, although I agree with you on the flasher vs camera, you need to see a Marcum Camera in action at night.

    I’ve guessing you’ve used another brand or an old style Marcum in the past?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VXkZ8cF4zE&feature=fvsr

    The above YT video show the bottom of a boat and then the camera is dropped down into 26 FOW and then the lights are turned on.

    The next segment shows the camera w/lights in 36 feet of water.

    As long as there’s some clarity in the water Marcum’s 4 year old “Darkwater” technology has changed the way cameras are used deep and at night.

    I had to get one more plug in for the season.

    Thanks!

Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.