We’re also in the market for more hunting properties. The problem I’m seeing is that sellers seem to be basing their expectations on what they hear cropland has been going for. In western MN near Marshall recently a 160 acres went for $9,000 per acre! And as proof that we didn’t learn much from the housing boom/bust, there are lots of speculators in the market now looking to hold for a year or two and then flip. Good luck to ya.
But that doesn’t make hilly, rocky, wooded, or wet land worth a dime more. In fact, it may even make it worth less.
My advice is to figure out what it’s worth to you and offer that. Especially in the case of non-buildable land, because non-tillable, non-buildable land has two strikes against it and this kind of land is not going to attract a lot of legit offers.
Make an offer and then it becames a matter of if/how badly the owner wants to sell to get out from the taxes. I certainly wouldn’t go with your best offer first because these days with rising rural property taxes you may find a seller is a lot more motivated to part with the land than they were 10 years ago when the property taxes were peanuts.
I know a realator in northern MN had a sudden rush of listings a few years back. A 2X county increase in property taxes for recreational land with no permanant structures finally got the attention of some absentee owners who had been holding on to Grandpa’s huntin’ land because it had been costing them almost nothing to do so.
Grouse