MN Fish, Hunt Regulation Changes Are Coming

Scott, thanks for taking the time to make the video and share the experience!! Stuff like this is what makes this site so fantastic.

Interesting arcticle that was recently featured in the Star Tribune.

Fish, hunt regulation changes are coming

Fish, hunt regulation changes are coming
Article by: Star Tribune
Updated: July 19, 2011 – 8:49 PM

Non-profit conservation groups such as Ducks Unlimited could have crucial projects put on hold if the state government shutdown is a lengthy stoppage.

The number of Minnesota lakes with special northern pike fishing restrictions will be capped at 100, a spearing ban on Cass Lake will be lifted and major changes are coming for duck hunters under a wide-ranging game and fish bill approved Tuesday night during a special session of the Legislature.

Gov. Mark Dayton is expected to sign it into law as part of a compromise spending bill approved by legislative leaders and the governor.

It caps the number of lakes with special northern regulations at 100 — 19 fewer than now, but 10 more than had been approved by legislators in a game and fish bill Dayton vetoed in May.

The DNR imposes the size restrictions, often with approval of lake associations and fishing groups, to try to boost the average size of fish in those lakes. Spearers say the restrictions prevent them from using those lakes.

The bill also lifts the spearing ban on Cass Lake and prevents the DNR from imposing any spearing restrictions on northerns there — an idea Dayton and the DNR opposed.

The latest bill includes no ATV restrictions, as did the earlier bill, which Dayton cited when he vetoed it. However, it contains numerous provisions affecting hunters, which also had been in the earlier bill. Among them:

• Removes a requirement that Minnesota’s waterfowl season begins the Saturday nearest Oct. 1. That means the DNR could open this year’s season on Sept. 24.

• Removes the 9 a.m. duck opener restriction, meaning hunting may start a half-hour before sunrise.

• Retains controversial antler-point restrictions for deer hunters in southeastern Minnesota for two more years but then requires legislative approval for any future antler-point restrictions.

• Removes the 16-foot height restriction for deer stands.

• Makes it illegal for a parent or guardian to knowingly allow a minor to hunt in violation of game and fish laws.

• Gives a motorist who hits and kills a deer on a road the first right to the carcass.

• Allows counties and towns to offer bounties on coyotes.

• Mandates that money raised by the $5 state walleye stamp be used only to stock walleyes bought from the private sector.

Doug Smith • [email protected]

Thanks for posting that Nice to know what else all got put through affecting us outdoor enthusiasts.

Quote:

---

• Retains controversial antler-point restrictions for deer hunters in southeastern Minnesota for two more years but then requires legislative approval for any future antler-point restrictions.

---

I’m glad this remains in effect for two more years, but then we have to have legislative approval for the DNR to manage the deer herd? I’m out of the loop on this, but wasn’t this put in place because a majority of the hunters in this area wanted more trophy class animals?

Just browsing through quickly, the only one that alarms me is the “if you hit a good buck with your truck you can keep him” provision. The coyote bounty…..well it’s about time.

Anybody want to trap them at my place?

Joel

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

• Retains controversial antler-point restrictions for deer hunters in southeastern Minnesota for two more years but then requires legislative approval for any future antler-point restrictions.

---

I’m glad this remains in effect for two more years, but then we have to have legislative approval for the DNR to manage the deer herd? I’m out of the loop on this, but wasn’t this put in place because a majority of the hunters in this area wanted more trophy class animals?

---

The way I understand it come 2013 it will be the legislators who will decide if this will become law or not and not the DNR. I am sure that our legislators are more qualified to make these kinds of decisions than the DNR!