Yeah, it is a slippery slope no doubt.
I will say this though. Just because slavery was a thing during Calhoun’s time, it doesn’t make it right. It is one thing to be alive and living in a country/state during an era of slavery, ethnic cleansing, etc. It is another to support it like Calhoun did.
And lets be real, Minnesota and slavery don’t go hand in hand, we aren’t living it dixie, we did fight against it in the civil war after all.
Would you rather tell your kid: This lake we’re fishing in used to be named after a man who was a supporter of owning other people, making said people perform manual labor with no chance of freedom till their deaths, and beating them if they didn’t work hard enough. All because they were born with darker skin. However, the name was changed because he is not worthy of the honor of having the lake named after him.
OR
This is Lake Calhoun, named after a man who supported enslaving black men, women and children. Who would work their entire lives for no pay, no freedom and if they didn’t work hard enough they would be beaten with whips and tortured. Now let’s catch some crappies!
Just playing devil’s advocate.