<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>buckybadger wrote:</div>
1. Reevaluate how the background checks system works to purchase firearms, especially towards males under the age of 21. It’s not a secret that young, troubled males are the most likely to take lives this way. If we “profile” young males on auto insurance with high rates, can’t we follow the trend and ramp up background checks or waiting periods for young males?I agree with much of what you wrote and see where you’re trying to go, but this point about “enhancing” background checks has been mentioned several times, so I think some are not understanding what the background check actually looks for.
The point I want to make is a background check can only reveal what gets recorded and what the law requires. Right now, there are no laws requiring the collection background data that would allow the check to reveal things like terroristic threats, erratic behavior, calls to the police reporting suspicions of mental illness, etc.
AND there’s no law that bans a potential gun buyer from being able to purchase a firearme due to the behaviors above.
Bottom line is that the background check can’t find information that is not there in the first place and it cannot be used to block a purchase if there is no law saying that must be done.
No amount of “enhanced” background checks would have blocked the FL shooter from getting a gun because there is no comprehensive reporting of “threat/ high-risk beahvior”.
Of course, you can see the issue here. Government profiling being used to block someone from doing something based on “reports”, suspicion, innuendo, etc… This gets us on to slippery Constitutional ground quickly.
<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>buckybadger wrote:</div>
5. Stop spewing stupid ideas about arming teachers. That’s ridiculous and won’t (nor should it ever) happen. Most of the people in here thinking that’s a great idea would get trampled by a few dozen unarmed teens “walking” to lunch on the average day. What do you think would happen in the chaotic event of a shooting with hundreds of people sprinting towards exits in crowded hallways, screaming, alarms sounding, etc.?I would think the epic failure of the on-scene sheriff’s deputy in Florida who sat outside with his pistol in his hand while the killer raged inside would show the total fallacy if this idea. There already WAS a highly trained person with a gun on the scene and look what happened!
As one military vet put it, nobody knows anything about how they’d perform in a firefight until they’ve BEEN in a firefight. There is absolutely no way teachers could be trained to perform to the level that would be required to be effective.
Grouse
Grouse
Great point about the background checks. The checks are only as good as the data entered. I’m not sure how that process would work with getting data warehoused that gun dealers, law enforcement, mental health professionals, and potentially schools could all have access to what they needed (and only what they need) for a collaborative effort.