Not sure what Canada has to do with this discussion.
Because the grass is always greener.
Look, here’s the deal from someone who has actually lived in a country with a single-payer or so-called “socialized healthcare” system. Bottom line is that it does NOT solve all problems. Whether or not you view it as “better” than our US system will depend on many, many factors.
On the plus side, everyone is covered.
The negatives are that people in countries like Canada, the UK (where I lived), and elsewhere in Europe ALL have as many complaints as we do. They are just different complaints for the most part. The common complaint is that someone else is getting a free ride on my back. Everyone, everywhere in the world has that idea.
Remember, no matter what system you have, someone has to pay for it. The reason taxes are very high in Europe and Canada (compared to our taxes here in the US) is because of this fact.
In general, I found the UK’s system to be:
1. Very accessible. Everyone gets reasonable care and it’s available everywhere. Records are centralized so if you are sick while away from home it’s just as easy as seeing your own doctor.
2. Very, very, very slow. They are big fans of “watchful waiting” and that is not to say that that approach is not the right answer sometimes.
3. Unless a procedure was an absolute emergency that could cause your immediate death, you were put on a waiting list. I have an in-law in the UK who has been on the waiting list for a knee replacement for over 5 years.
4. Care is very cheap by our standards. All Rx, for example, were less than $10 if not outright free.
5. Care is very regimented. Physicians have limited choices for each condition, they must “stay between the lines”. For example, they may want to try a new drug on a condition you have, but if that drug is not on the formulary, it’s a no-go, no matter what.
6. Care is delivered in a manner where cost vs benefit IS a consideration. This part especially freaks out Americans because we want everything possible to be done regardless of cost and probability of any meaningful outcome.
So there you go. IMO a completely mixed bag. To be perfectly honest, I have no idea which system I like better. The UK’s is very simply to participate in compared to ours where we have the complexity of both insurance AND navigating the healthcare system.
Grouse