Quote:
Greatimages there Ruger! Would I be wrong in assuming that you are not having any buyers remorse with your 997 purchase?
As a new user with limited experience and having to make the decision to go with Humminbird or Lowrance, tell us what your thoughts are now. Any regrets?
I’ve had my 997 for about a month now. The only regret I have is that I have to work Mon – Fri and can’t use my boat and the 997 as much as I would like.
I can say,(I’m sure Jason will agree) that you spend a lot more time “playing” with the Side Imaging then you ever did looking at traditional style 2-d graphs. My fiance has said a couple times “Will you just pick a spot and fish!” As I am spending more time “scouting” when I get on a new body of water.
Also I will say that the 997 requires way more user input on the fly than any other unit I’ve ever run. Changing graph display speed to compensate for boat speed, changing transducer freguencies as you need, changing display pages, sensitivity adjustments, etc. Maybe it’s because I’ve learned so much more and actually know how to adjust and optimize the 997.
Lastly I was shocked about the difference in how much I thought I knew about the bottom of a body of water vs. how much I’ve learned since putting the 997 in my boat. SI is an unreal tool.
I simply can’t wait to fish many of the northern MN lakes I that know. I’m really excited to “see” and learn what is so special about certain spots and look at spots that I’ve seen something on the traditional 2-d graph just as a “hump” or structure.