A side question for those salmon fishermen who run the SI on any of the great lakes…
Has SI been able to increase catch rates of salmon??
I am hoping that it does, but have yet to apply it in big open water situations. I’m really hoping that it will do a great job of locating schools of alewives as well as pods of kings associated with those schools. I assume it will work nicely (alewive schools can be HUGE… hundreds of yards long and 50 feet thick at times), and the salmon should be such big targets, I would think they would “mark” very nicely…
It certainly has advantages in finding and identifying structure… But have any of you salmon guys had any success in the open water realm??
— Or, for you open water walleye or musky guys – I would pose the same question.
I have, on occasion, marked a pod of 4 or 5 salmon with my old 2d sonar. Go over the pod, catch a fish off the rigger. Make a wide loop, go back, mark one less fish on the 2d, then the rigger goes off. Make a loop and repeat. One pod I kept going over and I went from 5 kings to 1, catching one king each pass, and marking one less 2d mark each pass. That last fish must have been too lonely to want to bite. I’m hoping that SI will allow me to do the same thing, but to cover a much wider path… Mark pods of kings to the side, make a waypoint, and then go try to get after them.
Whittsend