I chatted with a Navionics rep 4 years ago about “user created data” and he invited me to collect data on all of my favorite spots, and email it to them.. He even said I could name them whatever I wanted to, and it would show up on the card. Initially, I though, wow, thats cool. but the more I got to thinking about it. I knew that my data would go into their database once I pushed send.. Umm, nope, I dont think Im gonna do this.. Bought DR depth instead..
Realistically, Kirt how much new information could there possibly be on a lake that was already HD, or even water that you chose to fish on if it isnt HD. Essentially, youre giving away your favorite spot to the general public, should you decide to send them data. No one is going to spend time collecting data on spots that they dont angle on regularly, are they? If you were driving across Lake Wannab, and it wasnt high def, and you came agross a large area that was HD, dont you think you would investigate that, or think, wow, this is some dummies hotspot..
While it may be a nice program in concept, I just dont see it taking , at least the user created data.
After the first year, what does the program cost to update your chip to the most current information. And what about when your card is full, what happens then.
I’m not trying to be argumentative, these are legitimate questions.
I use both brands. Actually, I own more Nav chips than LM chips, at this time. and yes, I am a Humminbird user, if that makes any difference.. Ive answered the OPs question as honestly as I can regarding both chips, and I think at this time, hes going with the Nav chip, but I havent tried to pursuade him one way or the other..
Again, an honest question.
How does the sonar log work with a Humminbird?
Ive always used my 520 to do this for Dr Depth..